Are the white clots found by embalmers a hoax? (part 3, Kevin McCairn) - sars2.net

Other parts: clot.html, clot2.html.

Contents

Kevin McCairn's connection to Solution of Scientists

In March 2025 McCairn injected pieces of Hirschman's clot into the heart of a hamster, which died right after the injection. He didn't do a public stream about the experiment, but he only livestreamed it on his Discord.

Wayne Crouch posted an infographic about how McCairn killed a hamster after injecting it with "our amyloid jab clot samples". The graphic said that Kevin McCairn was linked to Solution of Scientists, which is the group that Wayne Crouch and Greg Harrison are part of. Crouch is supposed to be a journalist, but in his infographic he somehow managed to misspell the words "scientist's", "hampsters", and "acess": [https://x.com/WayneC50256258/status/1904696389176803605]

Wayne Crouch also wrote a Facebook post where he referred to the people who conducted McCairn's experiment as "we": [https://www.facebook.com/PureMediaAustralia/posts/pfbid02eEx7h76h64g7Bj1EkBzDkxHGnJ5VrXAubJsnM6eojjGenytdbVhCn6ySdNLWanLHl]

Crouch claimed that McCairn's experiment was proof that "we will see the rapid death to the shot recipients". But if the hamster died within seconds from the injection, then why haven't vaccinated people died rapidly yet, even though it's years since they got vaccinated? And injecting protein into the heart is hardly comparable to injecting LNPs into a muscle.

In March 2025 Tom Haviland published a Substack post where he described McCairn's analysis of the clots. [https://laurakasner.substack.com/p/a-horrifying-breakthrough-in-the] Haviland wrote that Greg Harrison was the "lead scientist" of a team that was analyzing the clots, and that Harrison asked Hirschman to send the clots to McCairn, and that Harrison asked McCairn to check the samples for the presence of prions:

Haviland's Substack post included a document called Kevin_Mccairn_Findings.pdf which described the results of McCairn's analysis of the clots. The authors of the document were anonymous, and the document was signed by "The Researchers":

McCairn told me he was not involved in writing the document. However one of the authors was probably Greg Harrison, because the document was formatted in a similar way as Greg's AI-generated documents. In 2024 Laura Kasner posted another similar PDF about the clots, where the cover of the PDF said that the "authors remain anonymous for safety reasons" even though Kasner wrote that Harrison was one of the authors. [https://laurakasner.substack.com/p/how-the-white-clots-are-formed]

The document about McCairn's findings said that "ORF-19 and ORF-11 are now functionally implicated in the induction of prionic seeding":

The names of ORFs were written with a hyphen in the PDF. The names of ORFs are normally written without a hyphen, but Greg Harrison and Wayne Crouch have both written the names of ORFs with a hyphen. [https://x.com/search?q=%22orf-19%22&f=live, https://puremediaaustralia.org/reading-room-1/f/an-unholy-triadthe-birth-of-a-plague-episode03]

McCairn told me on his Discord: "You seem incapable of understanding that I am working independently and the only link is that is that Greg claims to have done some investigation on the clots. What he has done has nothing to do with my lab analysis." But I linked to the Kevin_Mccairn_Findings.pdf document and asked him: "If you're so independent from Greg et al. then why did they write this report about your findings?" And McCairn replied: "I have no idea, and I did not give them permission to write that report or associate it with me any way."

Kevin McCairn's website has a section called "Prion Research Investigation Project". It includes a stock photo of people in a lab that I thought looked similar to the stock footage in An Unholy Triad: [https://synapteklabs.com/prion-research-investigation-project/]

But then I found that McCairn's stock photo came from the same collection of stock footage that was used in An Unholy Triad: [https://elements.envato.com/microbiologist-doctor-taking-a-blood-sample-tube-f-6RYNWUU, https://elements.envato.com/user/DC_Studio/stock-video?searchTerm=lab]

I thought that the stock photo on McCairn's website might have been a clue that the same people who made An Unholy Triad were also involved in making McCairn's website. McCairn told me that the page on his website was made by Chris France, who has also made other parts of his website. But when I asked Chris France how he picked the stock image, he didn't answer me.

Greg's AI seems to have prophesied the results of McCairn's Rt-QuIC analysis, because in December 2024 Greg wrote: "Thx Kevin, will send you emails with word docs attached in which AI is now telling us we have identified a new blood-born Amyloid-prion disease. All is conjecture but AI seems highly convinced we shall soon identify this new Amyloid-Prion hybrid disease with deep NMR's & RT-QuIC, plus a few more techniques to properly nail it. Interesting times ahead..thx Gregh" [https://x.com/Greg21143362/status/1868544701453983855] Next in December 2024 Greg said that McCairn was soon going to receive "our embalmer white clot samples": "Thank you Kevin, our embalmer white clot samples shall soon follow, preserved under Argon/dipped briefly in 70% ethanol, properly sealed - for both NMR & RT-QuIC amyloid-prion oligomer detection...we hope to soon send younger white clot samples from 20-30 year olds, same as we found positive for 55 & 90 year old Amyloid ThioflavinT/UV under microscope as appears here...Merry Christmas Wishes !! Greg & Richard...👋" [https://x.com/Greg21143362/status/1871488748422418854] Later after McCairn had presented the initial results of his analysis, Greg now said that his AI had confirmed the presence of amyloid prions with a 95% confidence level: "Yes - confirmed amyloid-prion presence with 95% confidence level according to our 3 AI engines in concert with each other...don't ask me which engines, these are the paid-for academic and proper research engines we using...not the useless free ones..." [https://x.com/Greg21143362/status/1904322522608447848] In March 2025 Greg posted this reply to a tweet about An Unholy Triad: "Thank you Wayne & Lisa, Episode 4 will expand in detail re relative pathogenicity of EACH ORF discovered so far. The 12 embalmers white clots samples provided yesterday to Dr Kevin McCairn for RAMAN & RT-QuIC analysis will reveal & substantiate the facts presented in this video series." [https://x.com/Greg21143362/status/1898486854099550605]

Greg Harrison and Wayne Crouch are promoting a McCairn-style narrative about a coming prion apocalypse. Wayne's cohost lady Lisa Johnston also tweeted that "Planet earth is under attack by prionic amaloidosis created by man": [https://x.com/lisarose030387/status/1909497793338917050]

Wayne Crouch is the director of a series of AI-generated videos called An Unholy Triad. The final video in the series presented a scenario of a prion apocalypse. First vaccinated people started developing calamari clots, and then prions from the clots ended up in wastewater, and wastewater carried the prions into the sea, so it led to the formation of deadly prion rain when the seawater evaporated, and also fish became full of prions which spread to humans when humans ate the fish, and in the end all of humanity died: [https://rumble.com/v6shndn-an-unholy-triad-the-birth-of-a-plague-season-02-episode-04.html]

In February 2025 Kevin McCairn appeared in a panel about the clots hosted by Steve Kirsch, which also featured Kevin McKernan, Richard Hirschman, Tom Haviland, and Greg Harrison: [https://rumble.com/v6k0oav-vsrf-live-164-white-clot-roundtable.html]

Kirsch is connected to the story about the white clots in multiple ways, because he was one of the very first big names in alt media who started talking about the clots, and I think he was the second person after Jane Ruby who interviewed Richard Hirschman. And I think Kirsch was the first person who interviewed Anna Foster and Cary Watkins, who were the next two people after Hirschman who said they had seen the clots. And the Died Suddenly also movie included more footage of Kirsch than any other person apart from Hirschman, the results of Haviland's first survey were published by Kirsch, and Haviland supposedly got the idea to do the survey after he was connected to Laura Kasner in Kirsch's Substack comments. Kirsch has also hosted two video roundtables about the clots, one of which featured two embalmers who I haven't seen appear anywhere else in alt media. And Kirsch posted two tweets that promoted An Unholy Triad.

So I thought that McCairn might have somehow become involved with the clots through Kirsch, because J.J. Couey said: "Steve Kirsch wanted me to evaluate Kevin McCairn's grant proposal in 2022, and we had a nice little text exchange on my phone about that. And so there again, he even offered to send me to Tokyo to help him work, and help him do those experiments." [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QpTQNgFCKZw&t=1h30m25s] So I asked McCairn on his Discord if he was getting paid by Kirsch, but he told me: "No money from Kirsch, I did send him a grant proposal though, he took my grant and proposed a US institute carry out the work, I didn't see anything beyond that."

And McCairn doesn't seem to have too many other connections to Kirsch, so perhaps it was a coincidence that McCairn happened to send the grant proposal to Kirsch.

In March 2025 I compiled comprehensive evidence on McCairn's Discord that Greg's ORFs were a hoax, so McCairn also recognized the ORFs to be fake. In April 2025 Greg Harrison tweeted: "And at this point in time, wish to retract my ORF 'rantings' due to our lack of credible evidence that any of our ORF stuff actually exists". [https://x.com/Greg21143362/status/1908007680406589892] At first I wasn't sure if Harrison was joking or if he actually dropped the ORF hoax, but McCairn told me on his Discord: "He has dropped it because I've reamed him out for it and how fucking stupid it is to be amplifying LLM hallucinations." And he said: "And now I'm aware of the LLM nonsense, I have told them there will be the strictest scientific standards applied, and I will not have nonsense like that as an attack vector". So it seems to have been McCairn who got Harrison to drop the ORF hoax, which might serve as evidence against a hypothesis that McCairn was somehow complicit in Greg's disinformation operation. But on the other hand the story about the ORFs was so clearly fake that it not only discredited Harrison but also people associated with him, which would've motivated people associated with him to tell him to drop the story.

When I asked McCairn on his Discord how he first got connected to Greg Harrison, he replied: "Here @Henjin is a screenshot of first emails, with time stamps with respect to Greg and Richard. Why don't we start here so you can order your thinking a little better. As memory serves I was involved in a Skype call, it was a group of researchers who had been looking at histological sections of blood from patients that showed microclotting where they presented their histological findings and I initially advised them on how to proceed to stain their tissue for presence of amyloid." And later he also explained: "As I recall it was meeting with clinicians who have worked with Richard to begin to measure and quantify what the clots were. They were trying to do thioflavin staining, but lacked the equipment necessary for precise histology. He was a part of that call, I didn't know him but he was obviously co-ordinating with Richard and the clinician group in Alabhama who are treating amyloidogenic microclots. As they were making procedural errors in trying to type the tissue, and I had the facilities available, i offered to process the tissue properly so that histological staining for amyloids was done correctly. I have received no money from them to do this or for the subsequent anlayses I have done using RT-QuIC, SEM/EDX and Raman spectroscopy. All of those methods have confirmed an amyloidogenic signature. Does that make sense?" I also remember that McCairn had tried to get samples of calamari clots to analyze for a long time before he was connected to Hirschman and Greg.

So as of now it's more or less clear that Greg's crew is deliberately producing disinformation, but it's not yet clear if McCairn is complicit in their operation, or if McCairn is an independent analyst who got inadvertently involved with Greg's crew because he volunteered to help with the histological staining analysis, or because he was looking for samples of the clots to analyze.

But in the case that the clots are fake and Harrison and Hirschman know themselves the clots are fake, would they trust someone to analyze the clots who was not in on the scam? People who had presented an analysis of the clots before McCairn include Mike Adams, Ryan Cole, Ana Maria Mihalcea, Clifford Carnicom, Zandre Botha, Arne Burkhardt, and Greg Harrison. But I believe all of them are controlled opposition. (I explained why I think Burkhardt and Cole are controlled opposition on my page about turbo cancer, because Burkhard and Cole were among the earliest people who started promoting the hoax about turbo cancer: turbo.html.)

When I asked Grok to list people who have presented a laboratory analysis of the calamari clots, the first two people it listed were Mike Adams and Greg Harrison. Grok said that McCairn's Raman and RT-QuIC analysis was done by "Harrison's team", because Grok cited a Substack post by Nicolas Hulscher who gave the impression that McCairn's analysis was done by Harrison's team: [https://thefocalpoints.com/p/microscopic-and-biochemical-analysis]

In March 2025 Philip McMillan did one video about Kevin McCairn's analysis of calamari clots, one video where he talked about Greg's ORFs and how McCairn had found the clots were autofluorescent, and another video about an AI-generated document which had mystery ORFs going up to ORF100:

Added in June 2025: Greg Harrison posted all of these tweets that promoted McCairn over a period of only two days: [https://x.com/search?q=%28from%3AGreg21143362+OR+from%3AGregGr67545%29+until%3A2025-6-5&f=live]

McCairn's naval intelligence cheerleader RexesRule

In early 2025 when Greg Harrison and his co-conspirators were promoting the hoax about the fake ORFs, their biggest cheerleaders on Twitter were users called CoyoteSanctuary and RexesRule/CatsRule2023. Both of them also joined Kevin McCairn's Discord around December 2024, which was after McCairn had started doing videos with Hirschman and Harrison. Even after I had posted exhaustive evidence on the Discord that the ORFs were fake, RexesRule and CoyoteSanctuary kept defending Greg's ORFs, and they just told me that I was crazy or that I was a counterintelligence agent. So I thought they might have been in on the scam, since otherwise their behavior of defending Greg's hoax did not seem reasonable.

When I looked into the Twitter profile of RexesRule, I noticed that her banner image had a seal that said "NAVSECGRUDIV" and "NAVCAMSEASTPAC": [https://x.com/CatsRule2023]

Wikipedia says: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naval_Security_Group]

The Naval Security Group (NAVSECGRU) was an organization within the United States Navy, tasked with intelligence gathering and denial of intelligence to adversaries. A large part of this is signals intelligence gathering, cryptology and information assurance. The NAVSECGRU organization was active from March 1935 to September 2005.

In addition to being part of the Navy, NAVSECGRU was also part of the National Security Agency's Central Security Service.

The NAVSECGRU organization was transferred to the Naval Network Warfare Command (NETWARCOM) where its former assets made up the Information Operations Directorate.

"NAVCAMS EASTPAC" is short for "Naval Communication Area Master Station, Eastern Pacific". [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naval_Computer_and_Telecommunications_Area_Master_Station_Pacific]

I found a thread where RexesRule wrote: "My NAVSECGRU team was the best." [https://x.com/CatsRule2023/status/1863653354909389166, https://archive.is/tZhov] Then someone asked "SEAL?" And she replied that she was a spook: "Sorry, no. Spook here. Love the Seals, though. How about you?" [https://archive.is/2gCXL]

An announcement from 2005 said: "What was formerly NAVSECGRU has now become NETWARCOM's Information Operations Directorate." [https://coldwar-c4i.net/NSG/NNS051005-04.html] The announcement also said: "The IO warfare area is composed of five core integrated capabilities: Electronic Warfare, Computer Network Operations, Psychological Operations, Military Deception and Operational Security." So I asked RexesRule if she worked for the deception capability or psyop capability of NAVSECGRU, but she didn't answer me.

Later after I got Kevin McCairn to agree with me that Greg's ORFs were fake, Greg Harrison posted a tweet where he wrote "And at this point in time, wish to retract my ORF 'rantings' due to our lack of credible evidence that any of our ORF stuff actually exists." [https://x.com/Greg21143362/status/1908007680406589892] After that RexesRule and CoyoteSanctuary also seem to have conceded that the ORFs were fake. However that doesn't mean that they couldn't have been complicit in Greg's operation, because it wouldn't have made sense for them to keep supporting Greg's ORF hoax after Greg himself had retracted it.

But on the other hand it's possible that RexesRule is just a useful idiot, because the oldest tweet that matched the query @RexesRule @Greg21143362 was only posted in February 2025, which decreases the likelihood that she would be part of a team that produces disinformation together with Greg Harrison. And similarly the oldest tweet that matched @CoyoteSanctuary @Greg21143362 was only posted in December 2024. But before that both RexesRule and CoyoteSanctuary had frequently interacted with Kevin McCairn.

RexesRule has made many meme-style images where she promotes Kevin McCairn, and she frequently posts tweets where she asks people to donate money to McCairn:

Kevin McCairn's connection to Cottrell, Couey, Kulacz, and Webb

I wrote about the topics covered in this section in more detail here: yt.html.

Kevin McCairn's website has a section for links to streams and websites that are related to his stream, which used to have links to J.J. Couey, Mark Kulacz, Charles Rixey, and a guy on McCairn's Discord who often goes on his streams, even though at one point McCairn removed the link to Couey's website. [http://web.archive.org/web/20230329103032/https://www.mccairndojo.com/] McCairn, Couey, and Kulacz were all part of a circle of early YouTubers who were focused on conspiracy content about COVID.

I first found out about Kevin McCairn in March 2020 because he was a guest on Paul Cottrell's YouTube channel. [https://stream.gigaohm.bio/w/pQuDyDr6ayo7n9xZ464Uk5] It was one of the very first videos McCairn did in alt media.

McCairn was later also featured in the first episode of Paul Cottrell's Coronavirus War Room together with George Webb, and McCairn and Cottrell participated in a series of video panels hosted by Addy Adds. [https://www.bitchute.com/video/xsNuoRDvyLIN, https://www.bitchute.com/video/Fxb5SNEnK5vf] The 8 oldest videos at AltCensored that match Kevin McCairn's name are videos posted by Addy Adds. [https://altcensored.com/search/new/page/2?q=kevin%20mccairn] Addy Adds functioned as a mini-me of George Webb for a while, he coauthored multiple books with George Webb, and he did several videos in person with George Webb. He calls himself a citizen journalist, like George Webb, Jason Goodman, and Mark Kulacz. Addy even said that he was knighted by George Webb, but I don't know if it meant that Webb initiated Addy to become a member of some secret order, or if it had a more mundane meaning. [https://x.com/OneAddyAdds/status/1721435465931174322]

George Webb also did many videos with Paul Cottrell, who was Webb's go-to guy on COVID science and Webb's biology teacher. Webb actually managed to learn an impressive amount of details about COVID biology from Cottrell.

George Webb has said that he shared an apartment in New York with a spy lady who worked as a caterer at Epstein's parties and who secretly videotaped the parties. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFxnxWCBu6I&start=1m39s, https://burners.me/2019/07/28/larpwars-part-2-moving-the-goalposts/] He has also said that he has homies at French Mossad. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dKBC3gChmKQ] In one video he listed his intelligence connections, and he said "when you start way smarter than your IQ, there's a good chance there's an intelligence person behind you making you smarter". [https://www.pscp.tv/webb4bernie/1ynKOjWpwBVxR?t=16m41s]

George Webb has also said that he worked with Dutch intelligence in New York. [https://www.pscp.tv/webb4bernie/1ynKOjWpwBVxR?t=10m55s] He wrote a book about Erasmus Medical Center in Rotterdam, which is where J.J. Couey used to work, and George Webb was also the main person in alt media who covered a mass shooting at the Erasmus Medical Center. George Webb used to be the sidekick of Jason Goodman, whose current sidekick John Cullen speaks Dutch. [https://x.com/search?q=from%3AI_Am_JohnCullen%20lang%3Anl&f=live]

Couey tweeted: "Even crazier when you realize that my first ever live streams of any kind were invites to join Paul Cottrell of Operation George Webb, Addy Ads of Operation George Webb, and McCairn...five weekends in a row. McCairn had a solo stream with Ads-Webb one week before. All in on it." [https://x.com/jjcouey/status/1827727108979724547] But Couey leaves out how his BFF Mark Kulacz was also part of the same circle surrounding George Webb.

In early 2020 both Kulacz and Webb were speculating that SARS-CoV-2 was created in Fort Detrick by Sina Bavari's team, even though I don't know which one of them came up with the theory first. In 2019 before Kulacz had started his own YouTube channel, he did his alt media debut on a channel that was launched by George Webb together with John O'Loughlin, who is the son of a high-level FBI agent. [https://x.com/leytedriver/status/1171849929427472384, https://x.com/leytedriver/status/1100400815032934404, https://x.com/HousatonicLive/status/1742404612819210380] Webb did many videos together with O'Loughlin in person, because they both lived in the DC area, which perhaps not coincidentally is where the headquarters of the FBI, CIA, and NSA are located. O'Loughlin is a retired lawyer who was a member of the DC Bar Association.

Mark Kulacz worked as a "competitive intelligence director" at the company Datto, which made the news in 2015 after the FBI seized a backup server of Hillary's emails that was managed by Datto. In 2019 Mark Kulacz came out as a whistleblower about Datto's role in the email scandal, even though most of what he said was already public information. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xTpvuAf-_jI] At first I thought his big revelation was that the email server was personally seized by Peter Strzok from the FBI, but Kulacz seems to have copied the claim about Strzok from an anonymous user on Twitter, who presented poor evidence for the claim. [http://web.archive.org/web/20180120165625/https://x.com/HousatonicITS/status/954173497168875520] But regardless, Kulacz's past as a whistleblower is interesting, because Hillary's emails were one of the main topics that George Webb focused on before COVID, and Webb had a unique theory that part of the emails were leaked by Eric Braverman who was the CEO of Clinton Foundation.

After Kulacz started his YouTube channel in 2019, the first guest on his channel was a lawyer from DC whose father was a high-level FBI agent, and the second guest was Patrick Bergy who worked as a cyberwarfare expert for the military contractor Dynology. [https://sites.google.com/housatonicits.com/live/episodes] Steve Outtrim wrote: "Like so many 'ex' intelligence people, Patrick Bergy got his alt-media start on Jason Goodman's 'Crowdsource the Truth' channel. Soon after he was interviewed by George Webb, and soon after that he filed his 'qui tam' lawsuit". [https://burners.me/2020/08/18/millie-freed-illuminati-recruiter-defango-maga-coalitions-biggest-donor/] However the third person in alt media I found who interviewed Patrick Bergy was Mark Kulacz, who also calls himself a citizen journalist like Webb and Goodman.

Bergy is also one of the few people in alt media who has done an interview with the Cicada 3301 member Thomas Schoenberger, and Bergy has even used Schoenberger's music as background music in his livestreams. [https://rumble.com/v29akrm-the-american-awakening-special-edition-thomas-schoenberger-interview-on-mat.html]

In April 2020 George Webb's brother reported that Jason Goodman had declared a cyber war against Cottrell because Cottrell appeared on Michael Decon's radio show together with Schoenberger. [http://web.archive.org/web/20200419220724/https://sdny.news/2020/04/03/conspiracy-theorist-jason-goodman-launches-into-fake-quack-doctor-paul-cottrell-in-epic-social-media-stereo-rant-after-thomas-schoenberger-video-surfaces/] During the show Schoenberger said that he had been following Cottrell's channel since mid-January, and Cottrell was a blessing and he was making a huge difference. [https://www.podchaser.com/podcasts/the-michael-decon-program-217641/episodes/dr-paul-cottrell-thomas-schoen-54538334, time 36:10] Both Schoenberger and Cottrell call themselves polymaths, but the Cicada 3301 member Marcia Stockton also calls herself a polymath. [https://x.com/AlphaUnseen/]

Thomas Schoenberger made a video about the origins of Q, where he said that in 2017 before the first Q drop had been released, he created a Q puzzle which was part of a Cicada 3301 puzzle called Sevens.Exposed. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=64CBZbzgbwI] An official website of Cicada 3301 has a list of their alumni which consists of three people, who are Bruce Clarke, who was the director of the Office of Strategic Research at the CIA, Iona Miller who is a researcher of the Count of St. Germaine, and Ian Murdock who created Debian Linux. [https://www.cicada3301official.com/pages/alumni.html] Bruce Clarke was Schoenberger's mentor, and Schoenberger has called himself a reincarnation of the Count of St. Germain.

Iona Miller's husband Richard Alan Miller has been featured as a guest of the Leak Project and Oppenheimer Ranch Project channels on YouTube, which were the first two channels I found where Paul Cottrell ever appeared as a guest, and in fact Cottrell and Richard Alan Miller appeared as guests on consecutive episodes of Oppenheimer Ranch Project in February 2020. [https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLJHy6u5Yrwd5lVj0KJnz-i6ubTAPg6CcV]

Paul Cottrell has a backup channel on YouTube called Abraham Lincoln. It includes only a single video, which is a video uploaded in 2015 that consists of a still image of the logo of Cicada 3301, and if you download the video and create a spectrogram image of the video, it contains a hidden message signed "3301". [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bCmKGFTEO2g] In the comments of the video there is a hint on how to proceed in solving the puzzle further, but I didn't figure out what the hint meant.

Paul Cottrell also posted a video on his main channel where he recorded his screen while he played the Abraham Lincoln video. In the comments someone asked "What is this?", but Cottrell replied "forward operations", and when someone else said it was a puzzle, Cottrell replied "much more than a puzzle my friend". [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6IRNXFCOV8s, i/yt-cottrell-cicada-3301.jpg] When I searched for the term "forward operations" in double quotes on Google, most results were about something called "defend forward operations" or "hunt forward operations", which are terms that are used in the context of cyber warfare and which refer to defensive cyber operations.

In addition to the Cicada 3301 video, Cottrell also posted a second cryptic video that only consisted of text that says "STONEHENGE 4-10-4" and no audio. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4oEBLAuVRj0] Someone posted this comment to the video: "Hello. Just to say coincidentally there is a skeleton at Stonehenge that was tagged as no. 4-10-4. He was decapitated and it was rumoured that it may have been king Arthur." It sounds like something from a Cicada 3301 puzzle, because they often involve historical artifacts or themes like the Grail legend.

In February 2020 Paul Cottrell posted a short video where he showed a tweet by Voice of Guo Media, which said that at a critical moment on June 4th, Miles Guo's people would go against the top level of the CCP. Then Cottrell said: "This is code. This is a CIA code for an operation. And what's happening is you take six for June 4th, 2020, okay. Cause that's the date that he's mentioning. Take the six for June divided by two, you get three. You take the four for the date divided by two, you get two. You take 2020, which is two plus zero plus two plus zero is four. Divide it by two, it's two. When you take those answers from those ratios, it adds to three, it makes three, two, two. That is the sign. That's the code that the CIA operation is happening. There is a takedown of the CCP and this was the launch code." [https://rumble.com/v6eic01-feb-4-2020-paul-cottrell-voice-of-guo-media-coronavirus-cia-steve-bannon-em.html] I don't know how he was able to tell that 322 was code specifically for CIA. But anyway, the video was so ridiculous that there's no way Cottrell believed it himself, so it seemed like deliberate disinformation.

In February 2020 Paul Cottrell became known as "the American whistleblower" in China after one of his YouTube videos went viral in China. [https://www.baidu.com/s?wd=%22paul+cottrell%22&gpc=stf%3D1580508000%2C1583013600%7Cstftype%3D2] In the video Cottrell said that a follower of his YouTube channel had contacted him on Facebook and sent him screenshots of text messages he received from someone at the CDC, who said that the CDC was hiding the true number of COVID cases in the United States. [https://www.bilibili.com/video/av91204053/] The screenshots looked fake because they showed the name of the sender as "Nancy Messonnier (CDC)", even though they were screenshots of the Messages application on iOS which only displays the first name of the sender. [https://x.com/benplowman/status/1231447635338264576/] The same screenshots had been published a few days earlier by the radio show host Hal Turner, who said that the text messages were not leaked by the person who received the text messages, but by his 18-year-old son who took the screenshots on his father's phone. [http://web.archive.org/web/20200217063226/https://halturnerradioshow.com/index.php/en/news-page/news-nation/alleged-c-d-c-text-messages-say-over-1-000-infected-with-coronavirus-in-u-s-a-being-deliberately-concealed] When someone on a Chinese website asked if Paul Cottrell's video was legit, another user linked to Hal Turner's website and indicated that it supported Cottrell's story. [https://www.zhihu.com/question/373999679] I guess they didn't notice that Cottrell and Turner had a conflicting story about the origin of the text messages.

Hal Turner worked as an FBI informant according to testimony in court by his lawyer and himself. [http://web.archive.org/web/20080118203302/http://www.recordonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080117/NEWS/801170326/-1/NEWS, https://archive.ph/soTD7#selection-505.0-512%2e0] He even ran a Nazi rally for the FBI in New York. [https://x.com/HeadlineUSA/status/1807032673942020181] In 2008 Hal Turner was plotting a feigned sequel to the Oklahoma City bombing together with a patsy he was working with. [https://headlineusa.com/fed-files-iii-fbi-informants-phony-obama-truck-bomb-tip-spurred-federal-probe/]

In 2010 Hal Turner told the New York Times that he "answered the call of the federal government to infiltrate the white supremacist movement", and he said that his racist persona was fake, and he told people to "be confident that the person you hear on radio is not real life". [https://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/04/nyregion/04hal.html] Paul Cottrell and Kevin McCairn are both livestreamers, which is basically the modern-day equivalent of shock jocks on talk radio like Hal Turner. McCairn makes fun of Stew Peters, but McCairn occupies a similar niche as Stew, because they are both shock jocks who have combined coverage of COVID with antisemitic content. Stew Peters serves a purpose of making antisemites look ridiculous, but McCairn also makes antisemites look like some kind of juvenile memetic warriors, and his knowledge about the Jewish question is very superficial.

Kevin McCairn is in his fifties, but he has positioned himself as a memetic warrior on the internet, and he and his followers make memes that include characters like Pepe the Frog and Wojak. Mike Benz used to have a fake white nationalist channel on YouTube called Frame Game Radio, which he said was part of a project by Jews to infiltrate the antisemitic movement. [https://x.com/MikeBenzCyber/status/1710479185028726943] The Twitter account of his white nationalist persona reminded me of McCairn, because Benz's profile picture was a Wojak wearing a Pepe hoodie, and his bio said that he was a veteran of memetic wars and that he "melded metals into memetic ammo". [https://web.archive.org/web/20170825221401/https://twitter.com/FrameGames] But both Benz and McCairn seem too old to be posting 4chan memes.

To my knowledge Kevin McCairn has coauthored two scientific papers about COVID. One of them was a paper he wrote with Richard Fleming, where they described a stunt where they filmed blood under a microscope while they applied drops of a COVID vaccine on the blood. [https://medwinpublishers.com/article-description.php?artId=9730] And the other paper was a paper about COVID origins by several members of DRASTIC, who included Dan Sirotkin and J.J. Couey. [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10311-021-01211-0]

I first found out about J.J. Couey because his YouTube channel was linked at the top of a blog post by Dan Sirotkin. [https://harvardtothebighouse.com/2020/01/31/logistical-and-technical-analysis-of-the-origins-of-the-wuhan-coronavirus-2019-ncov/] Couey discussed the blog post in his first two YouTube videos about COVID. Dan Sirotkin describes himself as a "former NSA counterterrorism analyst", and he went to college on an NSA scholarship, but as of 2024 he still lived in the DC area where the headquarters of various intelligence agencies are located. He is also a Jew like George Webb and Paul Cottrell. [https://x.com/Harvard2H/status/1425424404591284231, https://x.com/Harvard2H/status/1298767738811318272, https://x.com/Harvard2H/status/1603861877993476097] Couey tweeted: "Before DRASTIC existed, there was an original duo...Dan and his dad. And then I found them, and we became three. DRASTIC was after this." [https://x.com/jjcouey/status/1401262466978488320] So Couey was basically the third member of proto-DRASTIC after Dan and Karl Sirotkin. I believe McCairn has never been an official member of DRASTIC, but for example the intro and outro videos for his streams have been done by FunctionGain, which is likely an alter ego of Billy Bostickson who founded DRASTIC. [https://x.com/KevinMcCairnPhD/status/1677539890370859009, https://x.com/BillyBostickson/status/1653490934372528129, https://drasticresearch.org/drastic-tv/, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yfG4X-vV5XU]

Christie Laura Grace is another one of the many suspicious people McCairn is connected to. In May 2025 she and McCairn went on the Discernable podcast to talk about calamari clots. [https://discernable.io/confirmed-evidence-of-biological-engineering-and-novel-clotting-with-dr-kevin-mccairn/] Her pet topic is LNPs, so she predictably says that the calamari clots are caused by LNPs (in the same way that Geoffrey Norman Pain says that the clots are caused by endotoxin, and Bryan Ardis says that the clots are caused by snake venom). McCairn wrote "I have covered the LNP's and their propensity for abnormal clots with Christie Grace on stream multiple times." [https://x.com/KevinMcCairnPhD/status/1801412652650103294] In 2023 McCairn, Rixey, and Grace were featured in a video panel hosted by Philip McMillan, who seems like a disinformation agent because of his involvement in Greg Harrison's ORF hoax. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pYCjFViwBWw] Christie Grace has said that she "recorded experimentation on people" using equipment she received from Project Veritas, because she was going to be a whistleblower for Project Veritas. [i/christie-laura-grace-project-veritas.jpg] Her story was never released, but nevertheless Project Veritas is transparently a controlled opposition outlet, so it's suspicious how Grace was going to be one of their whistleblowers. The DEFUSE proposal documents were originally released by McCairn's sidekick Charles Rixey, who supposedly got the documents from Major Joseph Murphy, but a few months later the DEFUSE documents were released again by Project Veritas with additional commentary by Major Murphy.

When I did further research into Addy Adds, I found that in 2021 he ghostwrote a book for Cirsten Weldon, which is supposed to have sold about 200,000 USD worth of copies. [https://x.com/OneAddyAdds/status/1395768089581608963, https://www.instagram.com/caracirsten/p/CVamlVOLuLz/] Cirsten Weldon was part of Charlie Ward's trio of Qtard ladies called Charlie's Angels, which also included Mel K and Ann Vandersteel. George Webb and Addy Adds did multiple videos with the Qtard ladies and Charlie Ward. On January 6th Ann Vandersteel handed media passes outside the Capitol Building to Webb and Addy, who were shown in photos next to Vandersteel on January 6th. [https://x.com/RealGeorgeWebb1/status/1927406385089675489] Ann Vandersteel later became the host of Zelenko Report, but in April 2020 an early telehealth site which sold prescriptions for the Zelenko protocol was launched by Jerome Corsi, who at one point offered a monthly salary of 9,000 USD to George Webb and Jason Goodman. [https://burners.me/2019/10/29/insane-in-the-ukraine-part-3-sheepdipping-the-truther/] Cirsten Weldon is a former Playboy playmate and Mel K is a former porn actress, but they have both also had minor roles in Hollywood films or TV. Cirsten Weldon said that her manager also did the shows of the Qtard channels X22 Report, David Nino Rodriguez, and And We Know. [https://www.bitchute.com/video/X1NBkRFQAczg, 1:04:26] David Nino Rodriguez worked as an actor and stuntman in Hollywood movies, and And We Know calls himself "a retired Marine Corps broadcaster". [https://www.imdb.com/name/nm7339949/, https://andweknow.com/about/]

Scanning electron microscope images of fibrin clots

Richard Hirschman tweeted an image that was supposed to show a scanning electron microscope photo of a calamari clot taken by Kevin McCairn. Hirschman said the image showed amyloid fibrin, but in the replies Ian Musgrave said it was not correct: [https://x.com/ianfmusgrave/status/1915194687507620135]

This is how McCairn described the image shown by Hirschman: "When you go down to 5,000 times, what you see here - and it's only because unfamiliar with looking at these structures, that this was a standout abnormal to me, right - there are very clear nodular forms on these peptides, okay. I don't know if you can see that, right, so my cursor is here, right, like this will stick out. And if we look at this primary branch here, what you see is - fibrin should be a long smooth rope-like peptide that essentially just overlays itself to form the network around which platelets and other tissues that form a clot - can aggregate, okay. Here what you're looking at is a - and so, you're looking at very abnormal structural properties that are standout to someone who's familiar with looking at peptides in and of themselves, okay. And those are these nodular forms, and also - what I would point out to people is that - pay attention to this thicker filament, right, and um, in biology, often what you see - and that's not the best example that I can give for people to think about - is often when you look at a tree, a tree, as you look at the trunk has a sort of twisting effect to it, right. It sort of starts at the roots, and it sort of has a rotation to it, as it goes up to form the branch area of the tree. But the trunk often, if you pay attention to it, you'll see it has a rotation to it. And generally in biology, I would say it's a right-hand rotation, it's the right hand rule of thumb, and you can get into all sorts of metaphysics around electrodynamics and what that - how that relates to the body. But in this instance, what you're seeing is that you're seeing a faster twist - so rotations per unit of distance - than you would expect to see in normal healthy tissue." [https://rumble.com/v6sd87z-warning-global-amyloidogenic-health-disaster-with-dr-kevin-mccairn.html?start=6479] (He kept saying that fibrin was a peptide. But fibrin is not even a peptide but a protein. Peptides are short chains of about 50 or fewer amino acids.)

When McCairn showed an SEM image of the same sample at a 250-fold magnification level, he said: "Now we're going down to 250 times, and we're going past what a light microscope can reliably do." [time 1:43:21] Optical microscopes go up to about 1000x to 1500x magnification level due to the diffraction limit of light, so at first I was confused by his statement. But ChatGPT said that an SEM at 250x magnification can show more details than an optical microscope at 1500x magnification, which does makes sense. (Even though McCairn's image at a 5000x magnification level still has a very low level of detail for an SEM image.)

In the video by McCairn I linked, he also showed images of the same sample at 250x and 1000x magnification. (Edited later: I replaced the screenshots from the video with higher-quality images from here: https://kevinwmccairnphd282302.substack.com/p/cadaver-calamari-amyloidogenic-fibrin, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w3RjTGpEVWs&t=1h27m33s.)

The GIF files below show the 1000x image overlaid with the 250x image and the 5000x image overlaid with the 1000x image. The 5000x image has such a poor level of detail that it almost looks like it might have been cropped from the 1000x image, because the 5000x image does not have a much higher level of detail than the 1000x image:

Below McCairn's 5000x image is shown next to an SEM image of a regular fibrin clot at 5000x magnification. [https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Representative-scanning-electron-microscopy-images-showing-fibrin-clot-structure-in-a_fig1_371448021] The area shown in both images is about 25 µm wide (because the text "10.0µm" in McCairn's image means that the entire scale bar is 10 µm wide, and not that the scale bar consist of 10 segments of 10 µm each). In McCairn's image the strands have a diameter of about 0.2 to 3 µm, but in the other image even the widest strands have a diameter of only about 0.3 µm:

A typical diameter of a fibrin strand is about 0.1 µm: [https://www.researchgate.net/figure/A-scanning-electron-micrography-SEM-of-fibrin-polymer-17-Fibrinogen-from-healthy_fig1_267715843]

When I tried to find SEM images of fibrin clots that had a similarly irregular structure as the branches in McCairn's image, I found the image below. Image A shows regular spaghetti-like strands of fibrin that have a fairly uniform diameter of about 0.1 µm. But in image B where fibrin was clotted in the presence of the lipid DPPC, the fibrin formed wide irregularly shaped structures, so branches of the structure have a diameter on the micrometer level like in McCairn's image. Image B was described like this: "In contrast, in the DPPC MLV suspension the heterogeneous large-pore gels are formed with thin branched fibers and lipid particles incorporated into the gel structure (Figure 1, B). The images reveal many free fiber terminations. Fibers appeared to be highly adhesive forming dense mats and tight bundles." DPPC is a lipid, and MLV means multilamellar vesicle which is a type of liposome, so the balls circled in image B are balls of lipid: [https://sci-hub.se/downloads/2019-10-29/09/faizullin2019.pdf]

I also found a paper where fibrin clots were created in the presence of a fibrinolytic compound, which resulted in the formation of wide fibers with a diameter of about 0.5 to 3 µm: [https://www.mdpi.com/1660-3397/20/8/495]

The branches in McCairn's image had a diameter of about 0.2 to 3 µm. ChatGPT said that fibrin structures with a diameter on the micrometer level are unlikely to consist of individual fibrin polymers, but rather bundles of multiple fibrin polymers glued together:

Under normal physiological conditions, fibrin fibers (the building blocks of a blood clot) have diameters typically in the range of 50 to 200 nanometers (nm), sometimes up to 500 nm. So 0.05-0.5 µm is usual.

However, under abnormal or pathological conditions, fibrin fibers can become thicker, but usually not to the extent of 1 µm, and very rarely close to 10 µm as single fibers.

[...]

Bundles of fibers can easily be 1-10 µm in diameter - but those are multiple fibers glued together, not single fibrin polymers.

Single fibrin fibers, even under weird conditions, very rarely cross the 1 µm diameter threshold.

However later ChatGPT said that even fibers of fibrin with a diameter over 1 µm might not necessarily consist of multiple narrower fibers glued together, but wide fibers might also be formed due to a greater degree of lateral aggregation in the stage where the protofibrils form into fibrils:

Thick fibrin fibers with diameters over 1 micrometer generally form through a similar basic polymerization process as regular thin fibers (around 0.1 micrometer), but there are important differences in how they become thick.

Both thick and thin fibrin fibers start with the same initial steps: thrombin cleaves fibrinogen to create fibrin monomers, which then align end-to-end to form protofibrils, and protofibrils laterally aggregate to form fibrils. In thinner fibers, this lateral aggregation is moderate - a few protofibrils come together to form a fibril, and those fibrils form relatively fine fibers.

For thicker fibers, the key difference is that more extensive lateral association occurs. Multiple protofibrils aggregate side-by-side more completely, and sometimes additional bundling happens between already-formed fibrils. There is evidence that under certain conditions - such as low fibrinogen concentration, low ionic strength, or altered thrombin activity - multiple narrow fibers can clump together after initial formation, effectively fusing into wider fibers.

Thus, thick fibers (>1 µm diameter) can result from both mechanisms:

If indeed McCairn's image does even show fibrin structures, then I don't know if the thickest branches in his image are bundles of multiple strands of fibrin joined together, or if they are just single wide strands of fibrin. McCairn said that his image showed misfolded fibrin because the branches had an irregular and twisted shape, and the branches didn't look like smooth spaghetti like regular fibrin. But it may have been because he was looking at structures that were made up of bundles of fibrin and not individual strands of fibrin. (And the clumping of the strands may have been if for example the fibrin structure formed in the presence of a lipid or a fibrinolytic compound, and not necessarily because the fibrin was misfolded.)

When I asked McCairn why his SEM image had such a poor level of detail, he said: "The difference in detail comes from using a graphene base vs glass slide, and other factors, backscatter acquisition from surface or combined." When I asked why he couldn't use a graphene base, he said: "I use glass to be able run Raman on the same sample."

He also posted another similarly blurry SEM image at a 5000-fold magnification level (but it does seem to be a real SEM image judging from the EXIF metadata, which even includes the serial number of the Hitachi TM4000 instrument):

One reason why I questioned if McCairn's images were actually taken with an SEM was that I had the impression McCairn said he had bought his own SEM, but it would've seemed like an unnecessarily expensive purchase, and I hadn't seen an SEM in his lab in his videos. For example in a video where he showed his SEM images, he showed a photo of the Hitachi TM4000 SEM and he said "It costs serious money to go and get this type of data, ok. The machine you're looking at there is hundreds of thousands of dollars." [https://rumble.com/v6s3wjv-prion-clusters-excess-neuro-burden-in-the-young-promising-therapeutic-lab-d.html?start=6374] And in a tweet he posted before he had done the SEM and Raman analysis of the clots, he said that the SEM and Raman analysis would cost him about 150,000 USD, which made me think he was going to buy his own SEM instrument. [https://x.com/KevinMcCairnPhD/status/1871484694598238475] But McCairn told me on his Discord that he didn't end up buying his own SEM instrument, but he visited a lab in Japan to do the SEM and Raman analysis, and he linked to an old video where he visited the same lab and used the Hitachi TM4000 microscope. [https://t.wtyl.live/w/gwHJwtgbTVGZkYNqA1rxe2] And he said that the lab time "averages $1500 a day all costs included":

Richard Hirschman also said: "We've got now Kevin McCairn who's done this work. It costs lots of money. This equipment that he uses costs hundreds of thousands of dollars. It's not like you can just walk up somewhere and have this work done." [https://x.com/McCulloughFund/status/1920255597993189611, 1:16:59] But he was wrong because McCairn just visited some random lab to do the SEM and Raman analysis, and it didn't cost him hundreds of thousands of dollars.

One of McCairn's followers went around asking billionaires to donate money to McCairn because he said McCairn "LITERALLY JUST NEEDS A FEW HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS IN EQUIPMENT AND COULD SAVE EVERYONE FROM DYING HORRIBLY": [https://x.com/BlackTomThePyr8/status/1915925037430751313, https://x.com/BlackTomThePyr8/status/1915928819808035265]

Added later: McCairn posted these screenshots of a ChatGPT conversation: [https://x.com/KevinMcCairnPhD/status/1919788047870394613]

I replied to him: "Can you share the full chat? Those responses seem too good to be true, or like they conform too closely to what you're saying about the clots. Did you previously tell ChatGPT about your views? It even addressed you as 'Dr. McCairn'." And I showed him the screenshot below and said that when I gave the same prompt to ChatGPT on a fresh account, it didn't say anything about fibrin clots, but it said that "The fibrous network resembles that of electrospun fibers, biodegradable scaffold materials, or collagen matrices, commonly used in tissue engineering":

This was McCairn's explanation: "That's because I use the LLM properly, constraining it with a domain specialty based off my previous published works, and that it's role is to act as a colleague working in the same domain, with a number of academic based plugins, e.g., Consensus. As you have no published works in a formal scientific domain, you are not going to be able to use it in the same manner. And that was pretty much the extent of the exchange." But he didn't share the full chat. And Greg Harrison has also trained his AI to believe in mystery ORFs, so does that mean that mystery ORFs are real?

Then McCairn told me he wasn't able to share the full chat because ChatGPT said "Sharing conversations with user uploaded images is not yet supported", which does seem to be a real limitation of ChatGPT, but which was also convenient for him. [https://x.com/KevinMcCairnPhD/status/1919912314670874790] And it's not even possible to save the full chat history by printing to PDF or by taking a screenshot of the body node in devtools.

When I showed the same image to ChatGPT and asked "what would cause fibrin to have this shape", it gave me a list of 7 possible reasons, but they didn't even include the fibrin being misfolded:

Added later: When I asked McCairn why the strands in his image have a diameter of about 3-30 µm even though strands of fibrin normally have a diameter of about 0.1 µm, he replied: "That would be because they are highly amyloidogenic and diseased as is obvious through the structural abnormalities, which is supported by the positive signals with thioflavin, Raman spec, and reactivity under RT-QuIC protocols." [https://x.com/KevinMcCairnPhD/status/1922995808489632024] But I don't know how he can be so sure about it, if he hasn't even looked at regular fibrin clots under an SEM. I had a hard time even finding images of what "amyloidogenic" fibrin clots are supposed to look like.

When I tried searching for more images of unusually thick amyloid clots, I found the image below where image A is a normal control, and images B to D were abnormal clots from patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Image C has some some strands that have a diameter of about 0.3 µm, but it mostly just looks like several narrower strands of fibrin joined together: [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/immunology/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2020.577523/full]

But in general the structures in McCairn's image look like they are outside the range of variation of what SEM images of fibrin clots look like, even if the clots are abnormal. The strands in the clots don't have such variable width as McCairn's strands, or if they do then the wider segments look like they consis of multiple strands joined together, and not a single solid wide strand.

McCairn posted this tweet: [https://x.com/KevinMcCairnPhD/status/1923121243982610469]

But I told him that the average fiber diameter in the group treated with LPS is still about 100 nm. And in all images there's a much higher number of strands visible than in his image, even though the images display a width of about 8 µm but his image shows a width of about 25 µm.

And I posted this response from ChatGPT:

Key Differences

Image 1 (Cryostat Sliced Sample at 5000X):

Image 2 (Fibrin with and without LPS, 1 µm scale):

Scale Comparison

Conclusion

The structures in Image 1 are not consistent with classic fibrin fibers as seen in Image 2, either due to differences in sample preparation (e.g., cryostat slicing), degradation, or they represent a different biological material altogether.

I also told him that his image has a lot of variability in diameter within different parts of the same strand, and I told him ChatGPT offered the following as possible explanations for the variability in diameter:

1. Cryostat Slicing Artifacts

2. SEM Imaging of Hydrated or Non-Coated Samples

3. Biological Heterogeneity in Fibrin Structure

Someone should try to run SEM on a fresh calamari clot that has just been extracted for comparison, if such a thing even existed.

McCairn told me:

Why don't you in your input for your weak LLM rebuttals the following additional data.

1. The material has extensive autofluorescence.
2. The tissue stains positive with thioflavin
3. The sample test positive for Raman peak at 1720cm
4. The clot causes a positive amyloidogenic cascade in the RT-QuIC protocol.

Then put the response, here for all to see.

Then I posted the response below and wrote: "Well it did say your points explain the structure of your image, even though I don't know if it's a case of the bias where LLMs tend to agree with the user."

Yes, the listed observations strongly support that the structure in Image 1 is amyloidogenic, which explains the atypical, irregular, matted, and dense morphology seen in the SEM image.

Here's how each point aligns:

1. Extensive Autofluorescence

Amyloid fibrils are known to exhibit autofluorescence due to their cross-β-sheet structure and dense protein packing, which alter their optical properties. This supports the presence of protein aggregates rather than normal fibrin fibers.

2. Positive Thioflavin Staining

Thioflavin (T or S) binds specifically to β-sheet-rich amyloid structures. A positive result confirms that the fibrin in the clot has undergone a pathological conformational change to form amyloid-like aggregates.

3. Raman Peak at 1720 cm⁻¹

A peak near 1720 cm⁻¹ is typically associated with carbonyl vibrations (C=O) and altered protein secondary structure, commonly found in amyloid fibrils or oxidatively modified proteins. This suggests structural changes consistent with amyloidosis.

4. Positive RT-QuIC Amyloid Cascade

RT-QuIC detects the seeding activity of misfolded proteins. A positive result indicates the sample can propagate amyloid-like fibril formation, confirming prion-like behavior, which is incompatible with normal fibrin function.

Conclusion

These findings indicate that the material in Image 1 is not standard fibrin but is misfolded, amyloidogenic fibrin(ogen). This explains the abnormal morphology: thick, irregular, matted strands lacking the well-ordered, thread-like appearance of healthy fibrin networks (as seen in Image 2). This pathology is often observed in chronic inflammation, sepsis, or systemic amyloidosis-like clotting disorders.

When I further asked "do amyloid properties explain why image 1 has only a few strands visible, wide strands, and high variability in diameter within strands", I got the following answer from ChatGPT:

1. Few Visible Strands

Amyloidogenic fibrin tends to aggregate into dense, fused masses rather than forming discrete, well-separated fibers. Misfolded fibrin(ogen) often loses the ability to form normal polymeric networks, instead creating amorphous or sheet-like clumps. This results in:

2. Wide Strands

Amyloid fibrils in blood clots form through cross-β-sheet stacking, which encourages lateral association of protofibrils. This can:

3. High Variability in Diameter Within Strands

Amyloid formation is a heterogeneous and non-uniform process, influenced by local:

This leads to:

Summary

Yes - amyloidogenesis fundamentally alters the structure and assembly of fibrin, and this explains the low fiber count, wide fused strands, and diameter variability in Image 1. These features are consistent with a pathological, amyloid-rich clot, not a normal fibrin network.

In his presentations McCairn should've offered a similar explanation for why amyloid properties might explain the anomalous features. I don't recall McCairn having said anything about the unusual diameter of the strands until I brought it up on his Discord, let alone offer an explanation for why the wide diameter might be explained by amyloid properties. And he similarly hasn't brought attention to how his image shows only a small number of individual strands compared to other SEM images of fibrin clots that display a comparable area, let alone offer an explanation for why that would be the case.

And in order to evaluate whether the properties he observed were due to the preservation or preparation of the sample, McCairn could've also taken an SEM image of a freshly extracted calamari clot for comparison, or an image of a regular non-calamari fibrin clot that had been preserved and prepared the same way as his sample.

Mr. Micronicle's amyloid fibril with a diameter of about 20 micrometers

A user on Kevin McCairn's Discord called Mr. Micronicle has been posting various microscope images on the server, including images that he claimed showed calamari clots that came from the body of a dead person, even though he refused to answer me where he obtained the clots.

Mr. Micronicle also said that he took microscope photos of his blood stained with Thioflavin T, and he showed an image of a fiber-like object with a diameter of about 10-20 µm. Then Kevin McCairn said "That is the amyloid fibril, good job and nice image capture":

I posted this reply to McCairn:

Wouldn't it be an aggregate structure that consists of multiple fibrils? A single fibril would be much narrower based on what ChatGPT said:

McCairn responded: "All peptides are aggregate structures. Depends on the method of aggregation though and their resistance to proteases as to how we classify them as pathogenic." But I showed that ChatGPT said:

In scientific terminology:

Thus, a 10 micrometer-wide formation would be considered a fiber or an aggregate of fibrils, rather than a single fibril itself.

And McCairn said: "It is a fibril, singular, of oligomerized amyloidogenic fibrin. That description is correct." But I showed him that ChatGPT responded:

In principle, no - if you are using a standard light microscope, it would not be possible to image a single fibril of oligomerized amyloidogenic fibrin.

Here is a detailed explanation:

Wikipedia says: "Fibrils (from Latin fibra[1]) are structural biological materials found in nearly all living organisms. Not to be confused with fibers or filaments, fibrils tend to have diameters ranging from 10 to 100 nanometers (whereas fibers are micro to milli-scale structures and filaments have diameters approximately 10–50 nanometers in size)." [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fibril]

McCairn's defense was that the calamari clots were a novel phenomenon that required a novel vernacular, so it was acceptable for him to use the word "fibril" in an unconventional sense. He told me: "Trying to use old vernacular to a new blood prion disorder will lead the spergs like you to blow a fuse, but you'll just have to put up with it."

Then McCairn said this about the clots: "Nothing @henjin is sore that there have been multiple replications of the same phenomena and that they satisfy the metrics required to call them amyloidogenic peptides." But I replied: "You mean the fibrin or other proteins in the clots contain segments that act as amyloidogenic peptides? It wouldn't make sense to say that the clots themselves are amyloidogenic peptides." And I pointed out that ChatGPT said:

Strictly speaking, no, it is not accurate to say that fibrin clots themselves are amyloidogenic peptides. Here is the proper interpretation:

Thus:

Accurate phrasing would be:

Then McCairn just said that "we are dealing with a novel phenomenon, and as such the current repertoire of nomenclature does not fit well". But he wasn't willing to admit that he used the wrong terminology.

Earlier I had also called him out for saying that fibrin was a peptide, even though a peptide is a short chain of 50 or fewer amino acids, but fibrin is a polymerized protein product of fibrinogen, and each fibrinogen unit in turn is made up of 6 proteins that each have a length of about 400-600 amino acids. McCairn's response was that "You should also be reminded that the vernacular peptide and protein are interchangeable." But I pointed out that ChatGPT said:

No, it would not really be correct - even in casual speech - to call fibrin a peptide.

Here's why:

Calling fibrin a peptide would sound wrong to most people familiar with biology, even casually. It's much better (and more natural) to call fibrin a:

If Kevin McCairn sees a fiber-like structure under a microscope, he says it's an amyloid fibril, in the same way that Ana Maria Mihalcea would say the same fiber is a Morgellons fiber or a carbon nanotube, and Mike Adams would say it's a nanowire interface structure. McCairn gets mad at me when I compare him to the nanobot guys, but when I asked Grok to list people who have analyzed the calamari clots in a lab, it told me: "The individuals listed primarily rely on anecdotal observations, microscopy, or preliminary laboratory tests (e.g., RT-QuIC, spectroscopy) without peer-reviewed publication or independent replication. Their claims often involve nanotechnology, synthetic biology, or prion-like structures, which are not supported by mainstream medical research."

Mr. Micronicle's website used to be called "Zero Infinity One Network", which he said was "a reference to the esoteric sense of what mount Zion represents in esoteric terms": [https://x.com/micronicle3399/status/1803699989090074709]

Microscope images of mystery fibers in blood samples

During a video presentation Kevin McCairn showed the image below and said that "This long strand here is an abnormal fibril from a known vaccine injured patient." [https://discernable.io/confirmed-evidence-of-biological-engineering-and-novel-clotting-with-dr-kevin-mccairn/, time 2:21:13]

I think he is using the term "fibril" wrong, because ChatGPT said:

The term "fibril" is typically used in biology and materials science to refer to very fine fibers, often in the nanometer to low micrometer scale (usually less than 1 µm in diameter). For example:

The structure shown in the image, with a diameter in the range of 10-20 micrometers (µm), would more accurately be described as a fiber or filament rather than a "fibril." A 10-20 µm diameter is quite large for something labeled as a "fibril" in the conventional biological context.

The same image was featured on a section of McCairn's website where he advertised his abnormal fibril detection services. But the text next to the image looked like AI was asked to describe what was shown in the image, which inspires great confidence in his skill in analyzing abnormal fibrils: [https://synapteklabs.com/protocol-on-sending-blood-samples-2/]

ChatGPT said that the black structure was not an amyloid fibril based on its size, but it said it might have a synthetic fiber or a fungal hypha. It said this about the fine white network pattern that surrounded the dark structure:

This resembles a diffraction or interference pattern and could arise from:

Interpretation: If this is a dried biological or chemical sample, the white halo could represent diffusion-limited growth, protein aggregation boundaries, or optical artifacts around a dense core.

McCairn said that the pattern that looked like cracked glass "comes from the dried solute after adding ThT", and he said that Chris France writes his website ChatGPT but he just OKs it for publication.

McCairn's website also has another image of a mystery structure that he describes as a "fibril", even though at time 2:22:25 in his presentation where he showed a version of the image with a scale bar, the structure in the image was shown to be about 15 µm wide:

The structure in the image above has a fold that runs along the middle lengthwise. When I asked McCairn what the fold was, he said "And the fold running length wise is indicative of it being a coherent structure, that is one of the reasons why fibril is a fair description of the phenomenon. Again this is you running into the axiom of those that can and those that can't. This is a highly unusual amyloidogenic form." And when I said the structure was too big to be called a fibril, he said: "And one could say fibrillar forms, but fibrils is good enough at this stage, again because of the extremely large size differential between normal amyloids and these unusual fibrin amyloids." Then I asked someone else: "How do you even know that the structures shown by McCairn and Micronicle are fibrin clots? I think fibrin clots wouldn't have the kind of lengthwise fold in the middle as McCairn's green mystery fibril." But McCairn replied: "This objection to raw data comes from your years of extensive lab experience working with amyloids, I presume?" He also seemed to suggest that the two mystery fibers he showed on his website were the same type of structures as the mystery fibers in Mr. Micronicle's microscope photos, which all had a diameter of about 10-20 µm.

But are there even baby calamari clots that float freely in human blood, and that have a diameter of about 10 micrometers and a length of hundreds of micrometers?

The purpose of fibers of fibrin is to form a mesh that gets entangled with red blood cells, so the tangled mess forms a clot that blocks a punctured blood vessel: [https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/22/3/1472]

The reason why large clots have elongated shape is because they conform to the shape of a blood vessel, like if some entangled sticky mess was poured through a tube and the tube got clogged.

But why would a micrometer-scale fibrin clot that float freely in the blood also have an elongated shape? Did it form inside a small blood vessel and then get dislodged?

ChatGPT said:

1. Fibrin Clot Structure In Situ

2. Shape of Freely Moving Clots (Emboli)

3. Fiber-like Structures?

Conclusion

Capillaries have a diameter of about 5-10 µm, and arterioles and venules have a diameter of about 10-100 µm, so any of them might have plausibly served as vessel where a baby calamari clot with a diameter of about 10-20 µm was formed.

I asked McCairn that if his green structure formed inside a small blood vessel and then got dislodged, then why is it flat, and why does it have the lengthwise fold in the middle? He answered: "Good question why does this diseased protein have the form it does, it should be noted it's not the only form there are irregular & spheroid forms. I think it comes down to location of formation, nature of the underlying nano-scale fibril geometry, the species of protein, fibrinogen which makes long linear forms. Again we are in a process of discovery and relying on orthodox frameworks you constrain yourself to being able to competently describe it. But it's a common form, even described in the published literature."

When I asked why the fiber has the lengthwise fold, ChatGPT said that the fold might be if the fiber is a natural fiber like cotton, where the hollow lumen in the middle of the fiber has collapsed:

A lengthwise fold or groove is not characteristic of fibrin or amyloid aggregates. Instead, it is a well-known feature of certain textile or environmental fibers:

Based on the ribbon shape, width (tens of micrometers), and the longitudinal fold, this looks much more consistent with a collapsed plant-derived cellulose fiber (e.g., cotton lint) rather than any protein fibril or clot material.

McCairn showed on his stream the the green fluorescent ribbon and the image with a cracked background are part of the same sample. [https://rumble.com/v5zq84w-operation-blue-drone-and-lessons-in-fluorescent-microscopy-amyloid-signals-.html?start=11565] He claims it was a sample of blood of someone who was injured by a Moderna vaccine. From the stream you can also see the end of the ribbon which was cropped out in the photo on his website. It has a torn appearance that I think is not characteristic of a fibrin clot:

Fiber in the blood of a 3-year-old exposed to a vaccine prenatally

In May 2025 Kevin McCairn published his second Substack post: https://substack.com/home/post/p-164383206. He is now supposed to have analyzed a sample of blood from a 3-years-old toddler, whose mother was supposedly vaccinated on weeks 32 and 34 of gestation, and who was born prematurely on week 35 of gestation and resuscitated at birth.

The post may have been partially generated by AI, because one of the section headings was formatted as Markdown. Substack doesn't even support writing posts as Markdown, but some AI utilities format copied text as Markdown:

McCairn's post has the air of cheap propaganda due to the emphasis on harm done to babies. A trope among alt media morticians is that they have a dramatic story to tell about dead babies, like how Wesley the funeral director said that there were about 10 times more babies dying than normally, so the fridges were packed full of dead babies. [https://dailytelegraph.co.nz/news/uk-funeral-director-there-are-10-times-more-dead-babies/] And Nicky Rupright King said that after the vaccine rollout, she saw new types of deformities in dead babies she had never seen before, and that "the deformities that these children had were astronomical". [https://www.bitchute.com/video/3Ev4bzcLuj4e/, 24:45] And the anonymous embalmer whose testimony was published by Laura Kasner wrote that they saw "an exponential increase in the number of fetal and infant deaths in 2021", and she saw babies that died of SIDS a few days after their breastfeeding mother received a COVID vaccine, and that "100% of the fetal and infant deaths that occurred in 2021 were born to vaccinated mothers". [https://laurakasner.substack.com/p/embalmer-testimony]

The emphasis of McCairn's post was on scary microscope images, which is reminiscent of content by the Quinta Columna and Stew Peters crowd. ChatGPT said this about McCairn's post: "This document strongly resembles pseudoscientific or hoax material, exploiting scientific-sounding language and visual data without meeting the necessary standards of scientific proof."

McCairn showed these images of a mystery fiber he found in the 3-year-old's blood:

He also showed images of a second similar fiber, and he described the fibers he showed as "autofluorescent fibrillar structures" and "UV-reactive fibrillar microclots" and "amyloidogenic fibrin microclots".

Individual strands of fibrin have a string-like shape, because because their purpose is to form a criss-crossing mesh that traps red blood cells and that covers a punctured blood vessel. Some large blood clots have a string-like shape because they conform to the shape of a blood vessel. But that doesn't mean mini clots that are randomly floating around in the blood would also have a string-like shape, unless for example they formed inside a small blood vessel and then got dislodged.

Strands of fibrin typically have a diameter of about 0.1 µm, which is about 50 times smaller than the "fibrillar structures" shown in McCairn's images.

When Ana Maria Mihalcea sees a fiber-like object under a microscope, she declares it to be a Morgellons filament or a carbon nanotube. If McCairn sees the same object, he says it's a baby calamari clot, an amyloid fibril, or an amyloidogenic peptide. He previously claimed that this structure with a diameter of about 10-20 µm was an amyloid fibril, even though in reality amyloid fibrils have a diameter of about 5-20 nm:

McCairn also described this structure as a "fibril" (which I believe he claims to have found in the blood of a vaccinated person): [https://synapteklabs.com/protocol-on-sending-blood-samples-2/; https://discernable.io/confirmed-evidence-of-biological-engineering-and-novel-clotting-with-dr-kevin-mccairn/, time 2:22:25]

The structure in the image above is shown to be about 15 µm wide. But the word "fibril" usually refers to structures with a diameter in the nanometer scale, like amyloid beta fibrils which are typically 7-13 nm in diameter, or collagen fibrils which are typically 50-500 nm in diameter. The object in McCairn's image also has two features that are not consistent with a clot that has an elongated shape because it formed inside a blood vessel and got dislodged from the vessel, because the object is flat and wide, and it has a fold that runs along the middle lengthwise.

Kevin McCairn left in Markdown bold formatting in one part of his Substack post. I thought it looked like text copied from some AI utility, because Substack doesn't even support Markdown. One of Greg Harrison's AI-generated documents had similar Markdown bold formatting left in.

When I brought it up to McCairn, he said his post was an AI-generated summary and he left "the markdown in for transparency". But I don't buy his excuse, because the Markdown formatting was not even a clear sign that his post was generated by AI, and it would've been more transparent to explicitly write that his post was AI-generated.

The Markdown formatting appeared in the heading of a list titled "Clinical Case Summary", so at first I thought that only the list was generated by AI based on the rest of the post, and therefore I was wondering why the list mentioned details that were missing from the rest of the post. But McCairn clarified that the entire post was an AI summary based on a longer original post: [https://x.com/henjin256/status/1930594561115517436]

McCairn supposedly does his blood analysis using slides of blood mailed by his followers that contain only a small amount of blood, even though it's not clear if that's how he received the sample of blood of the 3-year-old. I pointed out that if he keeps finding baby calamari clots in random samples of blood with a small volume, there should be vast fleets of baby calamari clots swimming around in the bloodstream of people. But he refused to even answer me what volume of blood he analyzed: [https://x.com/KevinMcCairnPhD/status/1927142276217581798]

The Twitter user Markus pointed out McCairn said one of his microscope images was taken at a 4-fold magnification, but the scale bar seemed to indicate it was taken at a much higher magnification level: [https://x.com/mar15164/status/1927071726300451325]

ChatGPT said that typically "the field of view (FOV) for a 4x objective on a standard microscope with a 10x eyepiece is around 4–5 mm (4000–5000 µm)", but McCairn's image showed a width of only about 550 µm, which is only about 12% of the typical FOV:

But McCairn said he didn't even use an eyepiece, so the FOV at 4x magnification should be about 40-50 mm, which means that the visible width of his image is only about 1.2% of a typical FOV.

When I asked ChatGPT if an eyepiece can go up to 100x, it said 100x eyepieces are extremely rare and not practical for most applications, and typically eyepieces only go up to about 15x or 20x magnification. When I asked what could explain McCairn's narrow FOV if the image was taken without an eyepiece, ChatGPT wasn't able to give any reasonable explanation. But it did say it was possible that the scale bar was wrong or the magnification level was reported incorrectly.

McCairn replied to me: "The field of view is not 0.5mm you cretin, the scale bar shows the pixels derived from the camera using a calibration slide placed on the slide holder. you are looking at an amyloidogenic fibril that is 100's of micrometers in length and the scale bar in red shows 50 micrometers not 0.5mm you moron". [https://x.com/KevinMcCairnPhD/status/1928562639476764916] But I replied: "The scale bar is about 9% of the width of the image, and 50/.09 is about 550 µm. The field of view means the width visible in the image." And McKernan said: "Again you're wrong about calibrating the scope. And thread sliding trying to get away from the amyloidogenic clot data." But I replied: "How am I wrong? Is the field of view not about 0.55 mm? If you didn't even use an eyepiece, then how do you explain that your FOV is only about a hundredth of a typical FOV at 4x magnification without an eyepiece?" Then McKernan said: "No it isn't go back to your calculations and think how a stained amyloid structure which by the scale bar is close to 1mm in length fits in that FOV." But I replied: "The scale bar is 94 pixels wide, the image is 1047 pixels wide, and 94/1047 is about 0.090. The area of the fiber is about 765 by 260 pixels, and (765^2+260^2)^.5/94*50 is about 430 µm (but the fiber is not perfectly straight, so you can round the length up to 500 µm)." But after that he just replied "Science is moving on henjin" and linked to his new Substack post. But I told him: "You still haven't explained why the FOV is only about 550 µm if the image is taken at 4-fold magnification." But he said: "lmfao how is the fov 0.5mm, tell you henjin, get a scope, get a calibration reticle and see what you come up with. And the amyloid data is pouring in, suck on my big, fat, juicy 'fibril'. Feel its scale invariance pounding your tiny sperg hole!" And I asked: "Well what is the FOV then, and how are you supposed to calculate it? Is my calculation of 1047/94*50 wrong?" Then another user replied: "have you ever heard of something called cropping?" And McCairn answered: "These things would be beyond henjin, in his dos, html world." But I replied: "So your explanation for why the FOV is about 1% of a typical FOV at 4x magnification is that the image was cropped? Did the original image display a 100 times wider area but you cropped about 1% of the width of the image?" He didn't answer, but when I later asked the same question again, McKernan said: "Irrelevant sperg detail, when you have the image across 2 different methods and concordance. Simple fact is you have a large amyloid fibril detected, in the blood, that would fill clinical criteria for a clot. From nano to macro, the presentation is parsimonious." [https://x.com/KevinMcCairnPhD/status/1929183581537968191]

He referred to an SEM image of the same fiber-like object he had now posted on Substack. [https://substack.com/home/post/p-164833000] His SEM image was taken at 40-fold magnification, but the object in the image now took up about 50% of the FOV: [https://substack.com/home/post/p-164833000]

So why did the same object take up about 75% of the FOV in the other image that was supposedly taken at 4-fold magnification?

The object in the new SEM image is about 731 pixels wide, and the 1 mm scale bar is about 460 pixels wide, so the width of the area covered by the object is about 1.59 mm. But in the earlier optical microscope image, the width of the area covered by the object was only about 0.38 mm based on the scale bar.

Jikkyleaks asked: "Kevin are your scales correct on the SEM pic? In the first picture it looks like that fibril is about 500micrometres long, but the SEM scale is marked in millimetres." [https://x.com/Jikkyleaks/status/1928634205245690299] But McCairn answered: "Yes they are dead on accurate, you are looking at the difference between trying to calibrate off a glass slide reticle that comes from some Chinese sweat shop vs. the precision delivered by top off the line SEM. The scales are within the margin of error between the techniques deployed."

I don't know what the ring with the segmented pattern in the SEM image is, but the segments might be due to dessication. Before McCairn took the SEM images of the supposed microclot from the 3-year old, he is supposed to have done ThT staining for the sample. Earlier when I asked what the pattern that looked like cracked glass was in the image below, McCairn said it came "from the dried solute after adding ThT": [https://synapteklabs.com/protocol-on-sending-blood-samples-2/]

But anyway, I still didn't have an answer to why the old microscope image had a FOV of only about 0.55 mm even though it was supposedly taken at 4-fold magnification. So I asked McCairn: "So was your 4x image cropped or not? If so then what percentage of the width of the original image did the cropped image show? It's probably not nearly enough to explain why the FOV was only about 0.55 mm even though a typical FOV at 4x magnification would be about 40-50 mm." [https://x.com/henjin256/status/1929207032516637023] He posted a reply where he didn't answer my question, so I asked him again: "Was the image cropped or not? It should be a simple question to answer. Or did you use something like a tube lens or digital zoom?" I referred to this tweet by Markus: [https://x.com/mar15164/status/1929215136167776643]

I suspect there's a tube lens and/or other optical components of the camera setup that provides most of the missing magnification, rather than just cropping/digital manipulation.

per AI :

But McCairn still didn't answer my question: [https://x.com/KevinMcCairnPhD/status/1929222987800334487]

McCairn seems to routinely screw up the scale bars in his microscope images. In this image the scale bar is shown to be 10 µm wide, even though it's about 12-15 red blood cells wide, and red blood cells have a diameter of about 6-8 µm, which would mean that the scale bar is about 90 µm wide: [https://x.com/Melchizedek1972/status/1964386301186117887]

McCairn responded "Yes the scale bar is wrong it should say 50 micrometers, the 10 micrometers is a holdover from a scene done for more detailed analysis for an individual who wanted their blood looked at." [https://x.com/KevinMcCairnPhD/status/1964578431229890968] However I think the scale bar looks slightly wider based on the diameter of the red blood cells.

McCairn claimed that he got COVID from the Korean superspreader event 2 to 3 months before the event

I have joined Kevin McCairn's Discord server multiple times since 2020, and I was even made into a moderator on the server at one point, but I have usually left the server after a while because it had a very low quality of posts. McCairn banned me from the server in May 2025, because I said that the calamari clots were fake and he was probably controlled opposition.

Since his early videos in 2020, McCairn has said that he almost died after he got COVID from the Korean superspreader event in Daegu. He said he had severe neurological symptoms, which was a reason why he knew that COVID had a neurotropic effect and he decided to focus on researching the neurological aspects of COVID.

However the problem with his story is that the Korean superspreader event occurred in February 2020, but McCairn says that he was in Daegu from late November into December 2019. I haven't seen anyone call him out for his claim until I brought it up on his Discord:

I used to think McCairn probably had some other illness but he mistook it for COVID, but after I found out how there's also many other people in alt media who claim that they were among the first people who got COVID in their country, I started to think it's possible that he just made up the whole story about having COVID.

It also seemed like an unlikely coincidence that McCairn was an early YouTube streamer who was focused on COVID, but he also happened to be at the right place at the right time to get infected with COVID very early on. Often if a fabulist invents an embellished biography for themselves, they insert themselves in various locations over the world at a time when some event of historical importance happens to occur at the location. But the Korean superspreader event was probably the best-known event that occurred in Korea in the year of 2020.

In the unlikely scenario where McCairn is not lying and he was actually infected with COVID in November or December 2019, he might have been the first person with COVID in Japan, because he claims that he was still sick with COVID after he returned home to Japan in December 2019.

In the screenshot above I pointed out how Steve Pieczenik claimed that he was the first case of COVID in the United States, and he claimed that he got COVID after he met with a Chinese student from Wuhan (because I guess he didn't count the student as an earlier case of COVID in the United States). [https://www.bitchute.com/video/Dq8v0zZpVCCe/, 22:08] But how did Pieczenik even know what city the student came from? At the time Americans were not yet familiar with Wuhan, and it wouldn't have meant much to Americans what Chinese city the student came from. And similarly John Mark Dougan lives in Russia where there's only about 20,000 Chinese people in the entire country, but he claimed that he got COVID after he went to an immigration office where he saw Chinese people wearing masks. So in the same way that Pieczenik happened to conveniently come in contact with a student from the right Chinese city, and Dougan happened to convenently come in contact with Chinese people in a country where there's almost no Chinese people, McCairn also happened to conveniently visit the right city in Korea at the right time so he could catch COVID.

I don't know if McCairn actually even visited Daegu in 2019 like he claims, but in one video he also said: "I got hit by the biggest superspreader event in Asia, right early on, in November to December." [https://rumble.com/v6sfp5f-episode-174-spike-induced-brain-injury.html?start=3776]

Kevin McCairn's American sidekick Charles Rixey also claims that he got COVID at a time when there were only a few recorded COVID cases in the US: [https://sites.google.com/housatonicits.com/home0009/research/earlycovidsurvivors]

Added later: These were McCairn's earliest videos about COVID I found that were still available online:

Date Interviewer Title
2020-03-26 Addy Adds (Mar 26 2020) Addy Adds interviews Kevin McCairn PhD (COVID19 SARSCOV2)
2020-03-29 Paul Cottrell [Mar 29 2020] Coronavirus neurological discussion with Dr. McCairn 3-29-20 by Dr. Paul Cottrell
2020-03-31 Sarah Westall Evidence Suggests Virus Attacks Brain & Nervous System says Expert Neurologist Dr. Kevin McCairn
2020-04-04 Addy Adds #COVID19 Scientist Roundtable: Dr. Kevin McCairn Dr. Paul Cottrell Dr. JJ. Couey
2020-04-05 Stefan Molyneux Coronavirus vs the Central Nervous System - Dr Kevin W McCairn, PhD and Stefan Molyneux
2020-04-11 Addy Adds #COVID19 Scientist Roundtable: Dr. Kevin McCairn Dr. Paul Cottrell Dr. JJ. Couey, Dr Robert Young
2020-04-18 Addy Adds #COVID19 Scientist Roundtable: Dr. Kevin McCairn Dr. JJ. Couey,
2020-04-20 Addy Adds Live with Dr. Kevin Mccairn PhD - Kyoto University in Japan #COVID19 #corona
2020-04-25 Addy Adds #COVID19 Scientist Roundtable: Dr. Kevin McCairn & Dr. Paul Cottrell #roundtable #scientistpanel
2020-04-26 Paul Cottrell April 26 2020 Coronavirus War Room Ep. 1 by Dr. Paul Cottrell
2020-05-02 Addy Adds May 2 2020 COVID Scientist Roundtable Panel: Adds Cottrell McCairn Couey

I listened to several of the videos, but McCairn only said he may have gotten COVID in Daegu in one of the videos, which was a video he did with Addy Adds in March 2020. In the video McCairn said: "And, uh, where I had my lab, which was in South Korea in a city called Daegu, they'd asked me to sort of come and give a, uh, to help them in a project they were doing. And that time was October, no, sorry, November - I want to say it was November into December, but late November, right. And at that time, um, I came back, and over the Christmas period, I got really, really ill, right. And, um, it's sort of left - like the fever I was delirious, so I can't - and again, so I get memory issues because of the head injury. And so apparently when I was in the fever bit, I was coming downstairs and thinking days had passed. And, uh, it, it wasn't, you know, and it took me a week to sort of get over that. And then I was left just, um, with, it's called dyspnea where you can't really breathe." [https://t.wtyl.live/w/eafNsjv7kWn2VLTdyMisfA?start=1h26m22s] Then Addy asked if McCairn had COVID, and McCairn said yes, and he talked about how the Shincheonji cult had a church in Wuhan. And then Addy said: "There's a group of superspreaders there, then." And McCairn said: "Yeah, and I literally, I literally caught this, um, this illness and, uh, Shincheonji, it's called. [...] So I think I did get an exposure, because a lot of my symptoms fit, and it even left me with sort of, uh, angina and chest pain. And so a lot of these these symptoms that people were describing, I was like, 'oh'."

Substack post about SEM images of the 3-year-old's fiber

I have pointed out to McCairn that individual fibrils of fibrin have a string-like shape because their purpose is to form a mesh that traps red blood cells. And large blood clots have an elongated shape because they conform to the shape of blood vessels. But that doesn't mean that intermediate-scale formations of fibrin would also have an elongated string-like shape, unless for example they formed inside a small blood vessel and then got dislodged from the vessel.

When McCairn looked at a sample of blood from a 3-year-old under a microscope, he is supposed to have found this string-shaped fibrin clot with a diameter of about 5 µm and a length of about 500 µm: [https://kevinwmccairnphd282302.substack.com/p/amyloidogenic-fibrils-in-a-post-gestational]

Now in his third Substack post McCairn provided the following explanation for why his mini clot had a string-like shape: "These comparisons between nano- and macro-structures highlight the conserved geometry of pathological amyloidogenesis. This scale-invariant preservation of fibrillar architecture aligns with prior biophysical studies demonstrating that amyloid formation follows universal thermodynamic pathways, forming twisted ribbon-like or lamellar structures irrespective of protein species or environmental origin (Chiti & Dobson, 2017; Eisenberg & Sawaya, 2017). The similarity across scales - from nanometer-thick fibrils to centimeter-scale clots - suggests a deeply encoded biophysical template likely seeded by persistent amyloidogenic peptides, such as SARS-CoV-2 spike protein."

However I'm not convinced by his explanation, and I didn't find any part in the two papers he linked that would've explained why amyloid formations on the micrometer scale would have a string-like shape.

When I asked ChatGPT to describe the shape of different types of micrometer-scale amyloid formations in the human body, it gave me the following list:

1. Aβ (Alzheimer's)

2. Tau (Alzheimer's, FTD)

3. α-Synuclein (Parkinson's, LBD)

4. Transthyretin (TTR, Amyloidosis)

5. Light Chains (AL Amyloidosis)

6. IAPP / Amylin (Type 2 Diabetes)

7. Serum AA (Systemic Amyloidosis)

8. Fibrin-Amyloid (Microclots, Long COVID)

ChatGPT said that IAPP/amylin forms "sheet-like or intercellular ribbon deposits", but ribbons of IAPP typically have a diameter of about 10-15 nanometers. ChatGPT listed only type of amyloid formation that had a string-like shape, which were the microclots associated with long COVID. But I couldn't get ChatGPT to cite any source which said that amyloid clots associated with COVID actually had a string-like shape, so ChatGPT may have been influenced by McCairn's Substack post which I had shown to it earlier.

I asked McCairn: "Is there some specific part of the papers you cited which says that formations amyloid protein have a tendency to form into a ribbon-like shape in the micrometer scale?" [https://x.com/henjin256/status/1928612282696671237] But he gave me the following non-answer:

Here we go again, you are not looking at the canonical amyloidogenic form, merely based on the size of the aggregations .

How many times do I have to tell you this? That is why I as the domain level expert uses the language as I see fit.

Especially when it reacts to all the diagnostic measurements used to detect amyloids.

ThT Fluorescence, SEM structural characteristics, RT-QuIC reactivity, Raman Spectra confirmation.

I replied: "You suggested amyloid structures have a 'scale-invariant preservation of fibrillar architecture' so they have a tendency to form into a ribbon-like shape on the micro-scale, and you cited two papers from 2017. Which part of the papers supports your point?" But I didn't get any answer.

A paper by Pretorius and Kell featured the following images of microclots, with this caption: "Representative micrographs of ThT-positive events passing through the flow cytometer. All micrographs are obtained at 20x magnification. Each group contains 6 micrographs from different individuals. The image on the left of each micrograph is obtained from the bright field channel (Ch01), and the image on the right is obtained from the fluorescent channel (Ch07). The number in the top left corner of each micrograph represents the event number within a given sample run." [https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-4507472/v1]

I asked Douglas Kell if his group had also seen the kind of fiber-like microclots that were shown in McCairn's Substack post, but he just replied "these experiments are quite different so comparisons are not usefully made". [https://x.com/dbkell/status/1928858289166561296] Then I asked him: "McCairn supposedly finds these mystery ribbons on slides of blood he receives in the mail from his followers. Have you also tried looking at samples of blood under a microscope to see if they contain similar formations, or if they contain amyloid microclots?" But Douglas Kell told me: "We have only studied plasma".

Then McCairn posted this tweet: [https://x.com/KevinMcCairnPhD/status/1928898424038109639]

In the experiments conducted by @dbkell and colleagues, the whole blood is spun in a centrifuge, larger aggregates would be pulled to the bottom of the tube.

Spinning and looking at the plasma phase would leave the smaller amyloidogenic seeds in the plasma phase. This allows automated sorting through techniques like flow cytometry. This is a better approach for batch processing, you will miss the larger aggregations due to centripetal forces being greater on larger amyloidogenic forms.

Slide analysis is much slower, requires someone with trained eyes, is labor intensive, and requires the follow on tests of ThT staining, SEM/EDX, Raman Spec, for categorization.

Added in June 2025: I now asked McCairn again that when he cited the two papers from 2017, what part of the papers supported his claim that aggregates of amyloid protein tend to organize into a ribbon-like shape on the micrometer scale. [https://x.com/henjin256/status/1929356877130838498] But he now quoted the following paragraphs from the other paper: [https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biochem-061516-045115]

These β-structured oligomers are able to grow further by self-association or through the addition of monomers, often with further and sometimes dramatic structural reorganizations, to form well-defined fibrils with cross-β structure and a high level of structural order (Figure 1). Alternatively, the disordered aggregates or native-like aggregates can grow without any major structural conversion and give rise to large amorphous deposits or native-like assemblies, respectively, retaining the structure characterizing the initial oligomers (Figure 1).

Such large aggregates, including amyloid, amorphous, or native-like assemblies, have links with human disease as they accumulate in well-defined pathological states. Tables 1 and 2 list the proteins and the disorders that have now been identified to be associated with the formation of amyloid fibrils or other types of aggregates, respectively. (Supplemental Tables 1 and 2 also list, for each protein, references reporting the identification of the protein in the aggregates and the characteristics of the aggregate type.) We have arranged both tables in terms of proteins rather than disorders to stress the fact that many of these proteins have been found to be involved in a variety of pathological conditions. Interestingly, immunoglobulins or their subunits are found in all the different types of protein aggregates, including amyloid (as in light-chain amyloidosis), amorphous (as in light-chain deposition disease), and native-like (as in Berger disease) structures, thus representing a remarkable manifestation of the multiplicity of pathways existing in protein aggregation and of the structures and morphologies that can be generated (24-26). Those proteins that form intracellular inclusions of types that are still debated, such as TDP-43 and p53, are included in Table 2 with a footnote explaining this uncertainty.

But I pointed out that Figure 1 illustrated typical nano-scale amyloid fibrils. And Supplemental Table 1 characterized the shape of various types of amyloid structures as "intrinsically disordered":

Then McCairn posted his microscope photos and wrote:

You're so retarded! This particular amyloid, is novel and not listed because you're looking at science being done in real time.

The principles of misfolding though, are likely the mechanism leading to the macroform and of course the species of protein undergoing change. Fibrin is inherently primed to make macromolecular structures, hence the amyloidogenic form is going to be larger.

Which is why I have gone to the effort of showing concordant structure across scales.

So I told him: "Post-COVID clots are not relevant to my question. You cited two pre-COVID papers to support a claim that amyloid aggregates have 'scale-invariant preservation of fibrillar architecture' and they form 'twisted ribbon-like or lamellar structures irrespective of protein species'." And McCairn replied: "That's because there is no post-COVID manuscripts showing the phenomenon, in the manner that I have, you're looking at it being made right now, and disseminated to the public. It is usual in scientific writing to point to key historical citations that demonstrate concordance within hypothetical frameworks." But he still didn't answer my question, so I told him: "We already know you claim that baby calamari clots have a tendency to form into a ribbon-like shape on the micrometer scale. The question was which part of the sources you cited supports the claim that the same applies to other types of amyloid formations."

But then McCairn said "there is a coherency in the epistemological grounding of the amyloid PRION formation", so I told him that it sounded like great pseudo-profound bullshit: [https://x.com/KevinMcCairnPhD/status/1929507781163524103]

A user on Twitter said that the string-like object in McCairn's microscope image was too big to be an aggregate of amyloid protein, and it looked like dust or debris. McCairn cited a paper by Pretorius and Kell which said that "the fibrinaloid microclots that we observe are typically in the range 1-200 µm on their longest axis": [https://x.com/KevinMcCairnPhD/status/1930402739089223987]

However the text he quoted referred to this figure, which showed that the microclots of Pretorius and Kell did not have a string-like shape:

Added in June 2025: Children's Health Defense posted a video clip where Suzanne Humphries said that when she looked at the contents of a COVID vaccine vial under a microscope, she saw structures that look like circles and squares, and a while later she saw structures that looked like circuit boards forming in the vaccine: [https://x.com/ChildrensHD/status/1934672856232726843]

Under replies to the tweet, some random users posted about stories that they apparently thought were related to the discovery by Humphries. They included the chip-like structures found by people in Burkhardt's conference, graphene disks found by Zandre Botha, and the mini clot that Kevin McCairn supposedly found in the blood of a 3-year-old (but a common denominator between Burkhardt, Botha, and McCairn is that they all belong to the small club of people who have presented a laboratory analysis of calamari clots):

The tweet about McCairn's amyloid fibril was posted by a user called PinkBeachGirl1, which looks like a MAGA bot. It has posted almost 200,000 tweets: [https://x.com/pinkbeachgirl1]

Added in June 2025: McCairn now did a stream where he looked at the contents of a Moderna vaccine vial under a microscope. He saw this fiber-like structure, and he said "If I saw that in blood, I'd be like, uh, that looks suspect": [https://rumble.com/v6vgvsh-precipitating-botox-brain-sasha-latypovas-nanobots.html?start=7209]

McCairn showed the fiber-like formations were also autofluorescent. He said he didn't know what they were, but he said: "And the problem with there being bacterial contamination - I don't know how much those fibrous mats are like bacterial hydrogels in this instance." [2:05:23] He also showed this fiber-like structure in the Moderna vaccine that was stained by Thioflavin T:

He also showed this structure that he described as a filament, which was also stained by Thioflavin T:

Therefore the fiber that McCairn found in the blood sample of the 3-year-old may have also been a false positive: [https://x.com/mar15164/status/1938825698237661541]

Carrie Madej is also supposed to have found mysterious fibers in a Moderna vaccine vial: [https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/52/288]

This Twitter user also pointed out that amyloid fibrils are nano-scale structures: [https://x.com/mcfunny/status/1930426079275298827]

In 2022 McCairn did a video where he showed the microscope image by David Nixon below, and he said: "Everything that I see here is cholesterol, and literal fibers that you pick up in dust in the air. What I've seen these people do - they're not doing it in clean rooms - and you've gotta be in exceptionally clean rooms to make sure that slides are not getting contaminated. Sorry. You don't get to say that these are graphene internet fiber optic cables." [https://rumble.com/v22lzie-oy-vey-kvetching-iirt-sasha-latypova-rebuttal-sars-neuroscience.html?start=5211] But if he saw the same image in 2025, he would probably declare that the fiber is an amyloid fibril:

McCairn's Substack post was titled "Amyloidogenic Fibrils in a Post-Gestational Case of mRNA Vaccine Exposure: Structural, Pathophysiological, and Biosecurity Perspectives". So the title didn't use the phrase "amyloid fibril", which refers to nanoscale structures, and in the post McCairn wrote that the "fibril" he found was actually an amyloid formation (even though he still confusingly used the word "fibril" to refer to the formation). However Nicolas Hulscher's tweet about the post said that McCairn found "amyloid fibrils": "BREAKING: Amyloid Fibrils Found in 3-Year-Old After In-Utero mRNA Injection Exposure". A few days later when Hulscher wrote an article based on McCairn's post, he also used the phrase "amyloid fibrils" in the title: "BREAKING: Prion-Like Amyloid Fibrils Found in 3-Year-Old Born Lifeless After In-Utero Pfizer mRNA Injection Exposure". [https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-prion-like-amyloid-fibrils] His banner image for the post also included text that said "detection of amyloid fibrils at age 3".

The junk amplifier accounts SenseReceptor and toobaffled also wrote that McCairn found "amyloid fibrils" in the sample of blood: [https://x.com/SenseReceptor/status/1930279631208239434, https://x.com/toobaffled/status/1931650732782211405]

McCairn linked to a ChatGPT conversation where he uploaded his images of the mini calamari clot of the 3-year-old, and he asked if it conformed to "known amyloidogenic fibrillar forms of fibrin". [https://chatgpt.com/c/689ecab9-9ba0-8326-a605-6c1420ac3614] ChatGPT said the structure was a "macro-fibril": "Native fibrin typically exhibits 50–200 nm filament bundles; here we see a macro-fibril several microns wide, suggesting lateral fusion of many protofibrils into a ribbon-like band - a known amyloid fibrin phenotype." It also said: "This shifts the interpretation from 'probable' to 'confirmed presence' of β-sheet-rich amyloid fibrin macrofibrils."

The diameter of the 3-year-old's clot was about 10-20 µm based on the scale bar in the SEM image. When I asked ChatGPT what the diameter of amyloid macrofibrils was, it said the diameter was typically on the nanometer scale:

Amyloid macrofibrils are higher-order bundles of smaller amyloid fibrils. Their diameter depends on both the protein type and the aggregation environment, but in published measurements:

For example:

In his Substack post McCairn also wrote that the mini clot was a "macro-fibrillar form". [https://kevinwmccairnphd282302.substack.com/p/amyloidogenic-fibrils-in-a-post-gestational] I bet if Ana was told you can't see a carbon nanotube with an optical microscope, she would say it was a carbon macronanotube.

Youngmi Lee also said that the spiral-like structure on the right was a "macronanobot", even though it was visible with an optical microscope. She said: "Macronanobot! So whoa! Surprise! Amazing! I found macronanobot from my incubation study with Pfizer, you know." [https://rumble.com/v5byv09-millions-of-self-assembly-nanoparticles-in-covid-19-injections-ep-33.html?start=2210]

Here's a random microscope image of dust, where some fibers look flat but others have a more cylindrical shape. Some fibers have the kind of torn-looking ends as the fiber in Mr. Micronicle's photo: [https://www.dreamstime.com/ordinary-house-dust-under-microscope-microscopic-world-image261465832]

In his second Substack post McCairn posted optical microscope photos of a fiber that he supposedly found in the blood of a 3-year-old. He indicated that he was next going to run SEM, EDX, and Raman on the sample: "Guardians were explicitly briefed on the scope and purpose of data collection, the nature of imaging techniques employed (including UV fluorescence microscopy, Thioflavin T staining, preservation for SEM/EDX analysis, and Raman Spectroscopy), and how the data would be analyzed and disclosed." [https://substack.com/@kevinwmccairnphd282302/p-164383206] He also wrote: "A total of 31 micrographs were generated from one glass slide sample. The majority were imaged using autofluorescence under UV excitation only to avoid chemical interference and preserve structural integrity for scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) analysis, and Raman Spectroscopy."

However in his third Substack post McCairn only posted SEM images of the sample, but he didn't describe the results of EDX or Raman analysis. When I asked him if he had been able to determine if the fiber was made on fibrin, he didn't answer me, and when I asked if he had done SEM or Raman, he only said the sample was on a glass slide so he couldn't do Raman, but he might later attempt to transfer the sample to a quartz slide to do Raman: [https://x.com/henjin256/status/1961313482810237159]

A month earlier McCairn told me that he was still working on the samples, but that "For the moment, they remain ThT and phenotypically positive": [https://x.com/KevinMcCairnPhD/status/1945485401994502492]

So I asked him if he had now run additional tests on the sample to determine if the fiber was fibrin or not, but he indicated he hadn't done additional testing and he hadn't confirmed that the fiber was fibrin: [https://x.com/KevinMcCairnPhD/status/1961686961498075484, https://x.com/henjin256/status/1962222128775799274]

McCairn responded to my tweets by doing a stream where he said that he had in fact done EDX on the 3-year-old's fiber, but I don't know why he never answered when I asked him several times on Twitter if he had done EDX. He showed the image below, and he said: "What do we see when we look at Baby B with SEM/EDX? So - high-level focusing - carbon and oxygen, silicon is the glass-slide. Chlorine, whatever, I'd say that's salt from the saline in the blood and the dye I've dropped on it. Here we can see the elemental signatures." [https://rumble.com/v6yarfu-schizoid-spiral-saturday-the-henjin-files.html?start=8116 / https://t.wtyl.live/w/sjzg1FnJfwxk1zLisKkUJv?start=1h25m17s]

Next he showed the image below and said: "And there's the Raman signature that we have for it. And, um, carbon, chlorine - there's other ones not labeled here, but there's oxygen, phosphorus, [unintelligible]. What I would expect to see. And it's normal elemental signature":

I don't know why he said his plot showed a Raman signature, because he showed an EDX spectrum plot. Grok said:

The plot in the image appears to be an Energy-Dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectrum, not a Raman spectrum, based on its axes (energy in keV on the x-axis, which is characteristic of X-ray spectroscopy for elemental analysis, rather than Raman shift in cm⁻¹). Describing it as a "Raman signature" could stem from a few possibilities:

Next McCairn showed some of his SEM images, and he said that the 3-year-old's fiber was "connected to these microclots at either end", even though the string doesn't even look like it's connected to the blobs at the end, and I don't know how McCairn was able to determine that the blobs would be microclots:

Next at time 2:22:15 McCairn said: "One of these exchanges you have - I've had to have - with henjin - is what I call phenotypically similar or different. So does it have the features that I would expect to see from canonical microclots - like, examples - let's see if I find a quick example of microclots from someone else. So this is a microclots from a Moderna injured blood sample, taken in the laboratory, and basically showing the same ribbon-like and twisting features." And he showed this image:

But the ribbon he showed was flat and it had a lengthwise fold running along the middle, so it was atypical compared to the other fibers he has shown, which have had a more cylindrical shape so they looked like strings or twigs, and which didn't have the lengthwise fold. The scale bar is 20 µm wide, so if it's accurate, the fiber would be maybe 15 µm wide, which is consistent with the other fibers that McCairn has presented as fibrin clots.

Next McCairn showed the image below and said: "To me - like I wanna say - are they connected? Or are they aggregating together around the same - the same structure." And he pointed to the blob at the top and said: "And then there's this clot up here, which isn't too visible until you do the thioflavin staining, and then you see this sort of cluster." But the blobs didn't look connected at all to the string:

Next he again showed the SEM image and said: "You can kind of see with the electron microscopy there's like a shadow between them. And are they connected, right, together? Are they apart of the same structure. And where you have these tools, the light gray - the background changes right here, right. This is where you need the sensitivity signals."

Next as an example of what he meant by phenotypic similarity, he showed the image below and he said: "Here, where you see this twisting - which is what amyloids do - when you look at the sort of computer modeling of them, there's a sort of limit to the width that they can take. And they can braid to some extent, right, so they're not like a molecule thick. So they're able to sort of aggregate together and make a twisting braid." And he said that in primate studies of Parkinson's disease, "You would cut and section the brain, and the misfolding of proteins in this instance - you can't see it, you have to stain and look for it under a microscope, for the scale of it. Whereas these are visible to the naked eye, in terms of size, right, they can be hundreds of micrometers long. And that's not me making stuff up. That's the data we're seeing here. And it's being acknowledged in the academic literature for nearly a decade."

Earlier McCairn said that in his SEM image with a 5,000-fold magnification level, the reason why large "main branch" in the structure looked twisted was because of protein misfolding. [clot.html#Kevin_McCairns_scanning_electron_microscope_images_of_fibrin_clots] But the branch was about 3 µm wide, and individual fibrils of fibrin are only about 0.1 µm wide, so even if the individual fibrils would have a twisted shape, the aggregate structure wouldn't necessarily also look twisted. But now McCairn seems to say that a similar twisting structure is also characteristic of even larger fibers that are visible to the naked eye.

McCairn told me on Twitter he couldn't do a Raman analysis on the sample of blood from the 3-year old because it was on a glass slide, but he needed a quartz slide to do Raman. So I asked him if he couldn't have asked for another sample of blood on a quartz slide, but in his stream he now answered me: "His sample was very very precious, right. One, it's from a 3-year-old child. You do not want to go doing interventions on a child unnecessarily. Unfortunately for that child, he has had many interventions medically because of the condition he's in." [https://rumble.com/v6yarfu-schizoid-spiral-saturday-the-henjin-files.html?start=6876] But it sounds like a fake excuse, and I don't think it would've been too much of a major intervention to prick his finger for a second time. McCairn also said: "What the guardians of Baby B asked was that if I find something, make that something public." Wouldn't the parents of the child also have wanted to make sure that McCairn didn't misidentify the fibers in the blood? Would they have wanted Frank Bergman from Slay News to issue a red alert and claim the fiber was a "fibrous clot", if it was actually a speck of dust?

So McCairn's evidence that his fibers are amyloid fibrin seem to mainly consist of positivity by ThT staining, autofluoresence under UV light, and "phenotypic similarity" (which includes a twisted shape, and being embedded in the sample of blood and not resting on top of the dried blood).

ChatGPT said there are many reasons why ThT staining might result in a false positive:

False positives can occur because ThT is not perfectly specific for amyloid structures. Some potential causes include:

  1. Non-amyloid β-sheet-rich proteins

    • Proteins with extensive β-sheet secondary structure but not in an amyloid state may still bind ThT and fluoresce.

  2. Hydrophobic or aromatic interactions

    • ThT can intercalate into other hydrophobic environments or interact with aromatic residues, giving fluorescence unrelated to amyloid.

  3. High dye concentration (self-aggregation)

    • At excessive concentrations, ThT can self-associate and produce background fluorescence, mimicking positive signal.

  4. Non-specific binding to cellular components

    • Lipid membranes, nucleic acids, or other macromolecular assemblies may trap ThT, leading to signal.

  5. Fluorescent contaminants

    • Autofluorescence from tissue components, fixation artifacts, or other dyes used in the same sample may overlap with ThT's emission spectrum.

  6. Improper excitation/emission filter settings

    • Suboptimal microscopy or spectrophotometer settings can register spurious signals as "positive."

I also asked ChatGPT: "If a microscopic fiber in a blood sample is autofluorescent under UV, is it a fiber made of amyloid fibrin? What other types of fiber could it be?" It said:

Autofluorescence of a microscopic fiber under UV light does not by itself prove that the fiber is composed of amyloid fibrin. Amyloid fibrin has characteristic β-sheet structures that can be stained by dyes such as Thioflavin T (ThT) or Congo Red, but simple autofluorescence is a very nonspecific property. Many biological and non-biological fibers fluoresce under UV.

Why autofluorescence alone is not sufficient:

Other possible types of fibers in blood samples:

  1. Fibrin/fibrinogen fibers - Normal clotting fibers may appear fibrous and can have weak intrinsic fluorescence.
  2. Collagen or elastin fragments - Both are autofluorescent due to their cross-link structures and aromatic residues.
  3. Cellular debris - Cytoskeletal proteins (actin, tubulin, keratin) can form fibrous remnants and show fluorescence.
  4. Extracellular DNA/protein complexes (NETs) - Neutrophil extracellular traps form fibrous webs containing DNA and histones, which fluoresce strongly under UV.
  5. Contaminants - Textile fibers (cotton, polyester, nylon) or dust particles are common in microscopic preparations and many fluoresce brightly under UV.
  6. Other protein aggregates - Non-amyloid aggregates rich in β-sheets may bind nonspecifically to fluorescent molecules or show weak autofluorescence.

ChatGPT told McCairn that the EDX results of the 3-year-old's fiber were not consistent with cellulose or synthetic fibers: [https://x.com/KevinMcCairnPhD/status/1962276133325635890, https://chatgpt.com/share/68b4c521-fd54-800b-99b6-6d3f96c5647f]

He also asked ChatGPT to analyze his confocal microscopy results:

However it's still suspicious that earlier I asked McCairn at least 5 times if he had done EDX on the sample, and if so then why he hadn't reported the results, but he never answered me. [https://x.com/henjin256/status/1961313482810237159, https://x.com/henjin256/status/1961317652107809147, https://x.com/henjin256/status/1961533518137155748, https://x.com/henjin256/status/1961693800889217445, https://x.com/henjin256/status/1961881494114173092] So one possible scenario is that he spoofed the EDX results as a response to me.

I also asked him multiple times which tests he had done on the sample, but he didn't say anything about having done confocal microscopy. And I don't remember him having presented either the EDX or confocal microscopy results earlier, even though I haven't seen all of his streams so I might have missed it.

It's possible that his EDX results are real, and his fiber is made of human protein, but even then the protein might not necessarily be fibrin. I think McCairn has still not provided sufficient evidence that the fibers he finds are actually made of fibrin.

McCairn said on Twitter that "I do EDX as standard when using the machine". [https://x.com/KevinMcCairnPhD/status/1962253654590918916] The SEM and EDX results he showed were combined into a single PDF file of output, so I guess when he went to the lab to do SEM, he might have done EDX at the same time. But then I don't understand why he didn't say he had done EDX even though I asked it at least 5 times.

I don't even know any other person besides McCairn who claims to have found string-like fibers of fibrin in human blood. The images of microclots from Pretorius and Kell don't appear to have a string-like shape. If string-like clots of fibrin are now ubiquituous in human blood because of COVID vaccines, and McCairn has found them in several samples of blood from random people, then it shouldn't be too difficult for other people to find the fibers. So therefore I would like to see McCairn's findings verified by some neutral person who is not part of the anti-vaccine movement, and who is not the host of a conspiracy video show. McCairn is especially suspect as a source because of his connection to Greg Harrison, who I have busted producing blatant disinformation about the clots.

When I asked McCairn if he had taken SEM images at higher magnification of the 3-year-old's sample, he posted this image at a 5,000-fold magnification: [https://x.com/KevinMcCairnPhD/status/1964615823949267279]

I didn't find any region in the lower-magnification images that looked similar to the new image at 5,000-fold magnification. McCairn told me the new image was supposed to show a part of the 3-year-old's fiber, he refused to say which part it was: [https://x.com/henjin256/status/1964657152897024470]

McCairn wasn't even able to answer what part of the 5000x image showed the fiber and what part showed the background: [https://x.com/henjin256/status/1964682263737802949]

The cotton fiber in this image has the same type of torsion as the 3-year-old's fiber, which McCairn claimed was a characteristic of amyloid fibrin microclots: [https://tricliniclabs.com/reference-material/downloadable-documents/APPLICATION_NOTE-CONTAMINANT-IR-FIBROUS-ID-MAY-2023.pdf]

In fact the 3-year-old's fiber is consistent with a cotton fiber in terms of its diameter, flatness, and the torsion. Cotton fibers are also flat, and their diameter is typically about 12-25 µm:

ChatGPT said that these were morphological characteristics of cotton fibers:

ChatGPT also said that cotton might take up ThT:

Yes, cotton fiber can take up Thioflavin T (ThT), but the mechanism and extent depend on the fiber's structure and the experimental conditions.

Some key points:

Here's another image that shows how a distinguishing feature of cotton fibers are the lengthwise twists that are called "convolutions":

McCairn might also do a similar side-by-side comparison where he would show microscope images of different types of fibers next to his supposed microclots.

McCairn posted these microscope images of cotton fibers: [https://x.com/KevinMcCairnPhD/status/1964863856054051121]

In the second tweet, the two images on the top row show the 3-year-old's fiber and the two images on the bottom row shows cotton fibers.

I pointed out to McCairn that his images of the 3-year-old's fiber were taken at such low magnification that it was not easy to tell if the fiber had lengthwise striations. You can't even see it from the 200x SEM image, and the 5000x SEM image doesn't show any part of the fiber as far as I can tell. Also part of the difference in appearance between the fibers might have been due to differences in dying, ThT staining, or other properties.

For example this cotton fiber looks fairly smooth, and the striations are so subtle that they would not necessarily be visible at 10-fold magnification with an optical microscope:

McCairn supposedly keeps finding clots with a diameter of about 10-30 µm in small samples of blood. So then are there thousands of clots circulating in the blood stream indefinitely, so that once they reach the arterial capillaries, they pass through the capillary bed to the veins, go back to the heart, and go back to arteries again? And if the clots are somehow induced by vaccines, then how do they remain in circulation even years after vaccination?

ChatGPT said that a clot with a diameter of 20 µm wouldn't pass through the capillaries, which have a diameter of only about 5-10 µm: [https://chatgpt.com/share/68bec722-9864-8000-a1c8-d1a5206f4923]

No - a fibrin clot of the size you described (20 µm in diameter × 1 mm in length) could not "loop" repeatedly through the circulation. Here's why:

1. Size relative to vessels

Thus, such a structure cannot traverse capillaries.

2. Artery-to-vein transfer

3. Circulatory "loops"

The capillaries at the tip of a finger have a diameter of about 5-10 µm, so I was wondering if they wouldn't be too narrow for McCairn's fibers to pass through so they could be sampled with a finger prick: [https://x.com/henjin256/status/1965068669672997217]

But then I figured out that the finger prick lancet might reach deep enough to penetrate the arterioles and not only the capillaries. ChatGPT said:

Capillaries in the fingertip are far smaller than a 20 µm clot:

Because of this:

ChatGPT said that the arterioles start at a depth of about 1-2 mm beneath the surface of the fingertips:

In the fingertip, the vascular network is stratified. Based on microanatomical and histological studies of digital pulp and nail-bed skin:

So, arterioles that feed the capillary loops near the fingertip start around 0.3-0.6 mm beneath the epidermis, while larger supply arterioles run deeper, closer to 1-2 mm.

And ChatGPT said that a standard finger prick lancet typically reaches a depth of about 1.5-2.0 mm:

Commercial fingerstick lancets are designed to puncture only into the superficial dermis, deep enough to reach the superficial dermal plexus but not so deep as to injure nerves or larger vessels. Depth depends on device type and setting:

So I guess feasibly a blood clot might get stuck in arterioles because it can't pass through the arterial capillaries, and then it might get released if you do a finger prick that reaches the arterioles. So it wouldn't necessarily be anomalous if a clot is too big to pass through the capillaries, if in fact the clot was not circulating freely in blood, but it was stuck before the arterial capillaries in the fingertip.

McCairn now also posted the image below and wrote: "I've found a more clear image of the linear clot, but it's at a lower 4000X, the 5000x are all noisy. The reason for looking at high mag is to dispel the notion that it's cotton which shows pronounced linear striations. It's clear in this sample that the surface is dimpled, non-striated, and has nodules consistent with other amyloidogenic clots." [https://x.com/KevinMcCairnPhD/status/1965039653494591942/photo/1]

I pointed out the image was so blurry that subtle striations might be hard to see, but then McCairn pointed out that the fiber also had "protruding nodule/nucleation sites", which I think meant the small ball-like specks that were attached to the fiber:

Then I posted a microscope image of dust which included fibers with specks attached to the fibers, and I asked McCairn if his "nodules" or "nulecation sites" were just specks of dust, but he said it was unlikely because his fiber had been soaked in buffer and dye:

I pointed out it would be easy to test if you took a sample of dust that contained fibers with specks attached, you soaked the sample in buffer and ThT, and checked if the specks remained attached to the fibers. And I posted this response from ChatGPT:

Yes, dust specks could remain adhered to a microscopic fiber even if the fiber has been soaked in buffer and ThT, but the likelihood depends on several factors:

  1. Nature of the Fiber Surface

    • If the fiber is hydrophilic (e.g., cellulose or proteinaceous material), buffer and ThT will wet it well, which can loosen loosely attached dust particles.
    • If it is hydrophobic (e.g., certain synthetic polymers), surface tension effects may cause dust specks to stay trapped.

  2. Dust Particle Properties

    • Dust is heterogeneous: it can include inorganic particles, organic matter, fibers, salts, and lipids. Some of these bind electrostatically or hydrophobically to surfaces and are not easily washed off.
    • Small particles (<1 µm) may adhere strongly through van der Waals forces.

  3. Buffer and ThT Effects

    • Aqueous buffer itself usually does not solubilize dust (unless the dust contains salts).
    • Thioflavin T (ThT) is a small, charged, aromatic dye. At the concentrations typically used, it does not act as a detergent, so it won't remove particles strongly bound to the fiber.
    • ThT may even interact with hydrophobic dust or fibrous debris, leading to retention rather than removal.

  4. Mechanical Handling

    • Passive soaking is often insufficient to dislodge strongly adhered dust.
    • Agitation, sonication, or filtration would be more effective.

McCairn's comments about the cast of Died Suddenly 2

The Died Suddenly movie was produced by Lauren Witzke, who was the producer of Stew's show and his movies until 2024. In April 2024 Stew Peters posted this tweet: "The @DiedSuddenly_ account has been hijacked by @LaurenWitzkeDE et al and is currently not being run by the Stew Peters Network." [https://x.com/realstewpeters/status/1776687243760918915] Around the same time he filed a lawsuit against Lauren Witzke's production company, where he also said that the Twitter account and website of Died Suddenly were now run by Witzke's crew. [https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68403646/fokiss-inc-v-tlm-global-llc/, https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/lawsuit-exposes-internal-feuds-and-inner-workings-of-stew-peters-extremist-media-empire]

In May 2025 the Died Suddenly crew announced that they were raising funds for a new film called "Died Suddenly 2: Nano Sapiens", which was going to be directed by Matthew Skow, who also directed the Died Suddenly film together with Nicholas Stumphauzer. [https://x.com/DiedSuddenly_/status/1927822317607915557]

Jikkyleaks said that the cast of the film was full of glowies, but Kevin McCairn replied "LMFAO at the list of cretins in that list, Died Suddenly needs to die in ways only I can think up if they're grifting for funds to buy equipment": [https://x.com/Jikkyleaks/status/1928632048287355207]

One of the people featured in the film was Maria Zeee, but a few weeks earlier Kevin McCairn appeared on Maria Zeee's show together with Richard Hirschman, who was the main star of the Died Suddenly film:

Several other people featured in the Nano Sapiens film are also connected to the story about the calamari clots: [https://ds2nano.com]

Nicolas Hulscher's tweet about McCairn's Substack post and Morgellons connection

In June 2025 Nicolas Hulscher posted a tweet where he promoted McCairn's Substack post about the fiber that McCairn supposedly found in the blood of a 3-year-old. The graphic in the tweet said that the fiber was an "amyloid fibril", even though the diameter of the fiber was about 3 orders of magnitude bigger than the diameter of an amyloid fibril: [https://x.com/NicHulscher/status/1929689987974385879]

Two weeks earlier Hulscher interviewed Greg Harrison and Richard Hirschman about the calamari clots. McCairn told me he had informed Hirschman about how Greg was a scammer, but for some reason Hirschman doesn't seem to have a problem with going on podcasts with Greg: [https://x.com/KevinMcCairnPhD/status/1928128047515062379]

In May 2025 McCairn and Hirschman also went on Maria Zeee's show, which is now part of Vigilant News Network that was founded by TWC's founder Foster Coulson:

Nicolas Hulscher is the "foundation administrator" of McCullough Foundation, and he also runs the Twitter account of McCullough Foundation. Peter McCullough is the Chief Scientific Officer of The Wellness Company.

TWC's Chief Marketing Officer used to be Christopher Alexander, whose work experience includes having "successfully secured over 300 million dollars in contracts for Information Operations, PSYOP, and intelligence support" and being "recognized as a leader in disinformation, misinformation, and counter-propaganda campaigns". [https://beyondthemaze.substack.com/p/the-wellness-company] TWC's cofounder and the CEO of Zelenko Labs is David Lopez, whose bio says that he is a "Subject Matter Expert (SME) on Tactical Operations, Classified Global Counter-Terrorism Operations/Terrorist Countermeasures" and that he "serves as a special projects manager for Blackwater and conducts security operations around the world for select clients". [https://missionsixzero.com/our-team/david-lopez/]

In 2024 I scraped the reposts of about 80 accounts that I suspected to be bots that promoted content about COVID from the controlled alternative media. When I sorted COVID-related accounts by the number of reposts by suspected bots divided by their number of followers, McCullough Foundation ranked second. [bot2.html#Reposts_by_bots_compared_to_number_of_followers] The 4th highest ranking user was William Makis, who was a member of the "Chief Medical and Scientific Board" of TWC Canada, which is now defunct. [https://web.archive.org/web/20230909165713/https://twccanada.health/]

Makis promotes ivermectin and fenbendazole as miracle cures for turbo cancer. Before COVID both of them were presented as cures for Morgellons disease: [https://x.com/Humanparasites8/status/1121415232071581696]

A forum post from 2016 said: "I've also read that a lot of people who are suffering with morgellons have had some huge success with fenbendazole." [https://www.skinpick.com/comment/16074] A tweet from 2021 said: "I was suffering with an unidentified disease call MORGELLONS. Doctors thought we were all crazy. I used cattle wormer - FENBENDAZOLE FOR 3 YEARS and was pretty much cured!" [https://x.com/WETRIPP/status/1429176109745139715] A case study from 2011 described the case of a man who had earlier thought he was poisoned by the Japanese mafia, but he then learned about Morgellons disease from the internet so he started to think he had Morgellons instead, so he bought ivermectin in bulk from an online veterinary supplier, and he ended up developing ivermectin toxicity. [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033318211000521]

In 2024 Hulscher and McCullough coauthored a paper with Raphael Stricker, who is possibly the main person responsible for popularizing the Morgellons disease hoax. In 2021 Stricker also coauthored a paper with the TWC Chief Medical Board members McCullough and Risch: [https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Raphael-Stricker]

Stricker was a member of the advisory board of Morgellons Research Foundation, which was founded by Mary Leitao who coined the term Morgellons disease. Leitao's website featured these photos of Morgellons filaments that she supposedly found from the blood of her 3-year-old son, which are reminiscent of the mysterious fiber that McCairn found in the blood of the 3-year-old boy: [http://web.archive.org/web/20021121193025/https://www.morgellons.org/]

In 2019 the California Medical Board issued a complaint against Stricker because he had prescribed ivermectin as a treatment for Morgellons disease without obtaining informed consent. [https://lymescience.org/rogues/Raphael-Stricker/Raphael-Stricker-accusation-2019.pdf] Stricker was kicked out of academia because he falsified data in an AIDS study, and afterwards he worked as an associate director of a penis enlargement clinic. [https://forbes.com/forbes/2007/0312/096.html?sh=6f92216476c6, https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/not93-177.html]

Ana Maria Mihalcea said that calamari clots are "made from these filaments that Clifford Cardicom calls cross-domain bacteria or Morgellons filaments", and she showed these images of Morgellons filaments that she found in Hirschman's clots: [https://rumble.com/v4buruf-truth-science-and-spirt-episode-6-rubbery-clots-conversation-with-richard-h.html?start=2269]

Then Hirschman told Mihalcea "I had a live blood analysis of my own blood and my blood had some of those filaments in it too", even though it's not clear if by filaments he meant Morgellons filaments or some other type of filaments. [55:26] Mihalcea also presented a microscope video of blinking lights as evidence that Hirschman's clots contained quantum dot micro robots, but Hirschman told her "you got some pretty daggum solid proof behind you when you're showing the actual images, you're showing the blinking lights". [1:00:57]

The only scientific paper about calamari clots I have found was published in the journal IJVTPR. One of the people on the editorial board of the journal is Shimon Yanowitz. [https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/about/editorialTeam] Yanowitz said that the photo below showed a ribbon that he found in his blood even though he was not vaccinated, so he may have been exposed to the ribbon beacuse of chemtrails or shedding by vaccinated people. He said that the ribbon was possibly a Morgellons filament, and that it looked very mean and it made red blood cells nervous. Shimon's fiber was about 2-3 red blood cells wide, similar to the fibers that McCairn claims are fibrin microclots, and the fibers that Mihalcea says are hydrogel filaments: [https://www.bitchute.com/video/9ZFHWKEYxlCa/]

The term "turbo cancer" was first introduced in September 2021 in Arne Burkhardt's pathology conference. [turbo.html] People in the conference also said that vaccines contained mini robots, graphene oxide, objects that looked like SIM cards, and a parasite called Treponasoma cruzi. One person in the conference showed this microscope image of vaccinated blood, which she said showed a synthetic fibers that may have consisted of graphene, but another person suggested they were Morgellons fibers: [https://www.bitchute.com/video/jRX63Ohu0l0g, time 18:28]

In reality the fibers in the image above have several characteristics of cotton, because they are about 2-3 blood cells wide, they have a flat body with a cupped C-like shape, and they have the kind of lengthwise twists that are called convolutions in fibers of cotton.

One of the people in McCairn's circle is Johanna Deinert. She worked together with Arne Burkhardt and helped run his website, which is rather suspicious considering how Burkhardt appears to have been a Quinta Columna type plant in alt media.

McCairn's interview with Nicolas Hulscher promoted by Adam Finnegan

Adam Finnegan promoted this video McCairn did with Nicolas Hulscher: [https://x.com/AWFinnegan/status/1931058570113794162]

Kevin McCairn was one of the first people in alt media who interviewed Adam Finnegan, and Finnegan is promoted by many people in McCairn's circle.

In 2021 Finnegan wrote an article about Morgellons disease, where he claimed that he has witnessed Morgellons disease in his extended family members, he described the Carnicom Institute as a credible source, and he suggested that the presence of microplastics in rain might mean that Morgellons is spread through chemtrails. He wrote that Morgellons disease was the result of a "adverse events in nanotechnological failure", and he compared Morgellons filaments to nanowires produced by genetically modified viruses (even though supposedly Morgellons filaments are visible with an optical microscope, but nanowires are not). [https://onegreatworknetwork.com/adam-finnegan/invasive-immunization-barda-vectored-vaccines-oxitec-mosquitoes-morgellon-s-disease-origins]

Finnegan compared a photo of plastic fibers that were found in rainwater to photos of Morgellons filaments that were published by Mary Leitao: [https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/aug/12/raining-plastic-colorado-usgs-microplastics, http://web.archive.org/web/20021207085439/http://www.morgellons.org/pics3.html]

Finnegan is a regular guest on the channel of a son of a high-level FBI agent, who also recorded an audio narration of Finnegan's book, and who is Finnegan's biggest advocate in alt media. The son of the FBI agent launched his YouTube channel together with a Jew who has said that he worked with Dutch intelligence in New York and that he had homies at French Mossad: [https://x.com/leytedriver/status/1100400815032934404]

Finnegan was mentored by John Loftus, who also wrote the foreword for his book and who gave Project Paperclip files to Finnegan that Finnegan used as source material in his book. Loftus is a former Army intelligence officer, Nazi hunter, and president of the Florida Holocaust Museum. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Loftus_%28military_author%29] An old bio of Loftus said: "As a young U.S. Army officer, John Loftus helped train Israelis on a covert operation that turned the tide of battle in the 1973 Yom Kippur War." [https://web.archive.org/web/20030604055731/http://john-loftus.com/bio.asp] Loftus claims that he is an Irish Catholic, but he even wrote a column called "Spyview" for a Haredi Jewish magazine called Ami.

Loftus wrote several books about how the US intelligence apparatus was secretly controlled by the Nazis, including "The Belarus Secret" and "The War Against the Jews". Wikipedia says: "The Office of Special Investigations historian David Marwell described Loftus' book The Belarus Secret as 'the worst kind of amateur history.'[6] Vital Zayka, a fellow of the Center for Jewish History in New York City, accused Loftus of falsification.[7] The Israeli historian and Nazi hunter Efraim Zuroff described the book as controversial and referred to Charles R. Allen Jr.'s review in Jewish Currents, in which Allen joined the active criticism of Loftus and named him a fraud and a liar.[8]" [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Loftus_%28military_author%29] Loftus said that the publisher of his book "The Belarus Secret" was a former high-level CIA agent who had a Q clearance, and who taught him about the history of biowarfare. [https://open.spotify.com/episode/1ly6eXrVXG3ORiKtN2mHjY, time 2:40] So if you trace back the mentorship chain, Finnegan was taught about the history of biowarfare by a former military intelligence agent, who was taught about the history of biowarfare by a former CIA agent.

Loftus used to organize an annual conference called The Intelligence Summit, whose advisory council included two former heads of the CIA and senior officials of the Mossad. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Intelligence_Summit] Another member of the advisory council was Paul E. Vallely, who was Michael Aquino's commanding officer at the 7th PSYOP Group, and who coauthored the article "From PSYOP to Mindwar" with Aquino: [https://web.archive.org/web/20051001110034/Intelligencesummit.org/about.php]

The main financial contributor to the conference was the Israeli gangster Michael Cherney, who has been denied a visa to the United States since 1999 because of his involvement with the Russian Jewish mafia. In 1999 the Intepol issued an international arrest warrant against Cherney for money laundering and organized crime. [https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3835491,00.html, https://web.archive.org/web/20091214040717/http://www.interpol.int/public/data/wanted/notices/data/2009/42/2009_21842.asp]

Joel van der Reijden wrote this about Finnegan's mentor: "Other very obvious neocons - hardcore Zionists, in fact - that have appeared on Coast to Coast AM are Robert Spencer and John Loftus. Spencer runs the anti-Islamic outfit Jihad Watch and sits on the advisory board of the Intelligence Summit. [...] Loftus is tied to the highest levels of Israeli and Zionist political and intelligence circles. Former CIA directors James Woolsey and John Deutch sat on the board of his Intelligence Summit until 2006, when very obvious Russian mafia ties to the Summit's long-term financier, Russian Zionist oligarch Michael Cherney, were made public. Woolsey and Deutch should have known about these ties, because since the late 1990s Cherney has been repeatedly and convincingly linked to the powerful Russian-Zionist Solntsevskaya mafia and its allies. These allies also include the primary Rothschild partner in Russia, Oleg Deripaska, as well as the Israeli state, which prevented a KGB/FSB-ran assassination against Cherney in 1995. In 2003 Cherney also founded the Jerusalem Summit, which sponsored at least two small meetings between Israeli officials and American neocons. At the first meeting in 2003 Richard Perle and Coast to Coast's Frank Gaffney were present, along with Ehud Olmert and Benyamin Netanyahu. That's two visitors of Coast to Coast AM with clear ties to Michael Cherney: John Loftus and Frank Gaffney. Basically, inviting either of these two men is the same as giving voice to propaganda of the CIA, MI6, Mossad, Russian-Zionist oligarchs and the Russian-Zionist Solntsevskaya mafia all at once." [https://isgp-studies.com/coast-to-coast-am-radio-on-ufos-aliens-and-conspiracy]

In his book "The Secret War against the Jews", Loftus wrote that Robert Maxwell was a national hero of Israel, and that Maxwell was a great man because he supplied Israel with arms from Czechoslovakia in 1948. [https://archive.org/details/secretwaragainst0000loft/page/200/mode/2up?q=maxwell] The Mega Group's favorite charity was Birthright Israel, whose co-chair Charles Bronfman also cofounded the Mega Group. At one point 8 out of 12 board members of Birthright Israel were members of the Mega Group. [https://www.lawfulpath.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1485] An old EIR article mentioned that Birthright Israel was involved in joint ventures with Michael Cherney's charity: "But a closer look by EIR investigators at Birthright Israel raises some important questions about what the 'charity' is actually all about. Among the most disturbing pieces of the picture is its close links to an Israeli-based 'charity,' the Mikhail Chernoy Foundation, a tax-exempt front, set up by one of the most notorious of the Russian Mafiya figures residing in Israel. The website of the Chernoy Foundation boasts that it is involved in joint projects with Birthright Israel." [https://larouchepub.com/other/2003/3004megabucks.html] Russia's biggest aluminum used to be Trans-World Metals, which was cofounded by Cherney together with his brother and two other Jews. The money to set up the company was provided by Marc Rich, who also pledged 5 million USD to Birthright Israel, which was founded by his longtime friend Michael Steinhardt. [https://www.congress.gov/congressional-report/107th-congress/house-report/454/1] Alex Erskine was the director of Epstein's financial company Liquid Funding, but he was also a director of several subsidiary companies of Marc Rich's company Glencore. [https://books.google.com/books?redir_esc=y&id=DsSVEAAAQBAJ&q=liquid+fundings+erskine#v=snippet] Whitney Webb wrote that Ghislaine's brothers Kevin and Ian Maxwell were deeply involved with the Austrian company Nordex, which was cofounded by Marc Rich. [https://wappiepraat.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/blackmail-vol-2-by-whitney-webb.pdf] Nordex was employed to transfer Soviet assets to the United States through Michael Cherney: "Reports by Swiss and German intelligence implicated numerous persons in the Russian mafia through Grigory Luchansky's Vienna, Austria based Nordex and Boris Birshtein's Zurich Switzerland based Seabeco AG, KGB, FSB, and others in the scheme to move billions away from the Soviet Union and into a secret economy.[146][147][148] Some of the funds were sent to the United States through Semyan 'Sam' Kislan from Odesa, Michael Cherney and Lev Cherney using the United States firm Newtel Company and Alexander Smolensky's Stolichny Bank.[150][151]" [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FIMACO]

Adam Finnegan works as a "marketing media coordinator" for Trine Day Books, which also published his book. Trine Day also published the book "America's Nazi Secret" by John Loftus, and in late 2025 they are going to publish an autobiography of Loftus titled "My Clients were Spies". [https://trineday.com/products/myclients-were-spies] Trine Day was founded by Kris Millegan whose father was a high-level spook. Millegan says that he started studying conspiracy topics after his father told him about the covert operations he had been involved in. [https://odysee.com/@InformationMachine/kris-millegan-skull-bones-secrecy-and]

The first two guests featured on Finnegan's YouTube channel were Bruce de Torres and Daniel Estulin. [https://www.youtube.com/@AWFinnegan/videos] Bruce de Torres worked as a marketing director at Trine Day, and he also had a radio show on TNT Radio. Daniel Estulin claims that he is a former KGB agent, and he received a doctorate degree in "conceptual intelligence" from Venezuela. Estulin says that it's dem Venetians that run it all, even though his uncle Naftali Estulin is a rabbi who runs a synagogue and a Chabad House in Hollywood, and who also manages the Chabad Russian Immigrant Program in Hollywood. [https://x.com/search?q=from%3AQ17Ufo%20naftali&f=live, https://crownheights.info/something-jewish/622422/heres-my-story-nixons-list/, https://forebears.io/surnames/estulin] Finnegan's publisher Trine Day has also published 9 books by Daniel Estulin, and Trine Day's best-selling book of all time is Estulin's book about the Bilderberger Group. [https://trineday.com/search?q=estulin]

TNT Radio is now defunct, but it seemed like some kind of a Russian-backed disinformation operation. [yt.html#Trevor_Fitzgibbon_worked_with_Schoenbergers_ShadowBox_company] In 2023 TNT Radio launched a news site called The Intelligencer that is still in operation. The editorial board of The Intelligencer includes Bannon's protege Lee Stranahan, who first connected George Webb to Jason Goodman, and who also claims that he introduced Guccifer 2.0 to Roger Stone. The board of The Intelligencer also includes Roger Stone's lawyer Tyler Nixon. Another member of the editorial board ran an organization called Serbs for Trump, and another member is an adviser to the head of the Luhansk People's Republic. [https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/sep/19/intelligencer-pro-russia-website-trump] The most prolific author at The Intelligencer is Trevor Fitzgibbon, who worked with Thomas Schoenberger's cyber harrassment company ShadowBox.

John Loftus was a frequent guest on the radio show of Dave Emory, who is a leftist conspiracy theorist who finds Nazis hiding under every rock. [https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Aspitfirelist.com+loftus] In one of his old radio shows, Dave Emory said that the reason why all the crooks appear to be Jews is because they're actually Nazis with fake papers: "But the main reason according to John Loftus that the German government dragged its feet so dutifully in releasing documents about the Third Reich - there was a large documentation center in Berlin controlled by the German government, it was the single largest repository of information about the Third Reich, they only released it to journalists and historians a couple of years ago, more than 60 years after the end World War II - and the main reason for that according to John Loftus is that - as the Third Reich operatives were preparing for their post war underground careers, a massive forging program was underway within the concentration camps using forgers, who were basically a captive workforce to create very elaborate paper trails documenting many of these post war Third Reich operatives as Jews. So that in addition to Bormann Jews per se, there is also a substantive body of underground Reich slash Bormann capital network operatives, who are basically nominally Jews, but are in fact good loyal Nazis who have been given Jewish documentation. Again, what a perfect cover for an underground operative of any kind, then - to make oneself out to be the opposite of what one really is. So in addition to the concept of Bormann Jews per se, bear in mind that there was according to John Loftus a massive program to create a Jewish cover for post war operatives, and then rather like the financial crisis, it can be blamed on - your negative things can be blamed on quote 'the Jews'." [http://emory.kfjc.org/archive/ftr/600_699/f-690a.mp3, 16:53]

One of the main topics Dave Emory discussed on his radio show was how HIV was a bioweapon, and he also promoted the work of Len Horowitz and Alan Cantwell, who both said that HIV was a bioweapon created by the Americans. [https://archive.org/details/For_The_Record_16_Interview_with_Leonard_Horowitz_Alan_Cantwell_Ed_Haslam_et_al/f-016a.mp3] Alan Cantwell's protege St. Nick is part of McCairn's circle, and he has archived old videos by Horowitz and Cantwell on McCairn's PeerTube site. [https://t.wtyl.live/c/hiv_lab_origin/videos] Nick frequently also promotes Adam Finnegan, and he hosted a video panel that featured Finnegan and McCairn's sidekick Charles Rixey.

Nick claims that HIV is a recombinant of Visna and SIV, but he was unable to answer me which parts of the genome of HIV come from Visna, and I have shown him similarity plots which demonstrate that no part of the genome of HIV is closer to Visna than to SIV. [https://x.com/henjin256/status/1880786821292101754] Nick uses the word "fusion" to refer to genetic recombination, so he keeps presenting a paper titled "Visna virus-induced fusion of continuous simian kidney cells" as evidence for his recombination hypothesis, even though the paper is about Visna-induced syncytium formation of host cells, where the word "fusion" refers to host cells merging together into a cell with multiple nuclei, and not to recombination of two different species of viruses. [https://x.com/search?q=syncytium+from:henjin256&f=live] After I had called him out multiple times for presenting the paper as evidence for his hypothesis but he still kept citing the paper, I said that he seems to be deliberately producing disinformation, because at that point he should've known himself that the paper had nothing to do with his hypothesis, but he blocked me in response.

Len Horowitz was knighted by the Russian branch of the Knights of Malta: [http://web.archive.org/web/20230423183611/http://67.225.245.71/Press/press_releases/personal/knighting_2006.html]

His knighting is interesting considering how the Soviets launched a series of disinformation campaigns which claimed that HIV was a bioweapon created by the Americans: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Denver]

The groundwork appeared in the pro-Soviet Indian newspaper Patriot, which, according to a KGB defector named Ilya Dzerkvelov, was set up by the KGB in 1962 with the sole purpose of publishing disinformation.[11] An anonymous letter was sent to the editor in July 1983 from a "well-known American scientist and anthropologist" who claimed that AIDS was manufactured at Fort Detrick by genetic engineers. The "scientist" claimed that "that deadly mysterious disease was believed to be the results of the Pentagon's experiments to develop new and dangerous biological weapons", and implicated Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) scientists sent to Africa and Latin America to find dangerous viruses alien to Asia and Europe. These results were purportedly analyzed in Atlanta and Fort Detrick and thus the "most likely course of events" leading to the development of AIDS. The letter claimed that The Pentagon was continuing such experiments in neighboring Pakistan and as a result, the AIDS virus was threatening to spread to India. The title of the article, "AIDS may invade India", suggested that the immediate goal of the KGB's disinformation was to exacerbate tensions between the U.S., India, and Pakistan.[11][12]

Two years later, the KGB apparently decided to make use of its earlier disinformation to launch an international campaign to discredit the U.S. They wrote in a telegram to their allied secret service in Bulgaria, the Bulgarian Committee for State Security (KDS) on September 7, 1985:

We are conducting a series of [active] measures in connection with the appearance in recent years in the USA of a new and dangerous disease, "Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome - AIDS"..., and its subsequent, large-scale spread to other countries, including those in Western Europe. The goal of these measures is to create a favorable opinion for us abroad that this disease is the result of secret experiments with a new type of biological weapon by the secret services of the USA and the Pentagon that spun out of control.[8][13]

The Soviet story about Fort Detrick is reminiscent of how George Webb and Mark Kulacz claimed that SARS-CoV-2 was created in Fort Detrick by Sina Bavari. Kulacz did his alt media debut on the channel of John O'Loughlin, who is Finnegan's biggest advocate in alt media. [https://x.com/HousatonicLive/status/1742404612819210380] George Webb also started promoting Adam Finnegan's book soon after the book was published. [https://x.com/search?q=from%3Arealgeorgewebb1+finnegan&f=live] George Webb and Jason Goodman both speak fluent Russian according to Steve Outtrim, and Jason Goodman was married to a Ukrainian. [https://burners.me/2019/10/24/larp-wars-part-3-shadowbox/]

But I don't know if these various Russian connections are relevant to Finnegan, who actually says that Erich Traub was a Soviet agent. And as of now I have a hard time deciding if Finnegan is deliberately producing disinformation, or if he is just a useful idiot, even though his connection to John Loftus is highly suspicious.

Fearmongering about the clots by Black Tom

A Twitter user called Tom Czerniawski said that prions from vaccines will kill so many people that all human life on earth will end, and he said it was not hyperbole or exaggeration. Kevin McCairn replied to him suggesting that the prions will result in an evolutionary bottleneck event: [https://x.com/BlackTomThePyr8/status/1928824583651545587]

Earlier Tom Czerniawski was going around asking billionaires to donate money to McCairn, because he said that if McCairn receives a few hundred thousand USD in donations, he "COULD SAVE EVERYONE FROM DYING HORRIBLY": [https://x.com/BlackTomThePyr8/status/1915925037430751313, https://x.com/BlackTomThePyr8/status/1915928819808035265]

Here Tom said that calamari clots will cause a cataclysmic pole shift to arrive more quickly, and Ethical Skeptic agreed with him: [https://x.com/EthicalSkeptic/status/1932162118536884307]

The same disinformation pipeline promoted McCairn's fibril and a paper about vaccinated people being magnetic

In May 2025 Kevin McCairn published a Substack post about how he supposedly found an amyloid fibril in the blood of a 3-year-old. His story went viral after Nicolas Hulscher published a Substack post about the story. Hulscher's post was then copied by Frank Bergman, who is the most prolific author on the fake news site Slay News. Bergman's article was promoted by the Died Suddenly account on Twitter, which posted a screenshot of Bergman's article copied to another fake news site called TRUTH11.COM:

A week later a paper about how vaccinated people were magnetic was published in the Indian predatory journal IJIRMS, which has also published papers by Hulscher and McCullough. At first the paper didn't get too much attention, but it went viral a few days later after Nicolas Hulscher wrote a Substack article about the paper, and after that Hulscher's article was again copied by Frank Bergman, and Bergman's article was promoted by Died Suddenly:

Microscope images of the blood of Jesus4AllAlways

A Twitter user called Jesus4AllAlways posted this tweet: [https://x.com/Jesus4AllAlways/status/1937482532544463347]

My family of 5 are unlucky patients who took pFIZER Feb 2021 double jab In Rockaway NJ.

Using an Olympus CX 43 lab microscope from January 3, 2024 regular for some reason in November 2024 I observed the fiber looking structures in my blood. I began to research what they were.

Suspicious of the PJab in January to May 2025, I checked my wife and children. Bad news.
I observed the same strange structures in each of them.

Pic 1 shows my May 25 observation of myself

Pic 2 is 22 year old child

Pic 3 is wife

Pic 4 is 20 year old

Patient 5 was promoted to glory June 23, 2021; 4 years yesterday. "Rapid onset of dementia" (thousand of micro strokes) is what the doctors said.

The first image was actually a video clip, but I included a screenshot of the video above. The guy in the video said that the cells were white blood cells, but I think they're actually red blood cells.

Kevin McCairn posted this reply to Jesus4AllAlways, where he indicated that one or more of the structures in the images were "amyloidogenic fibrin": [https://x.com/KevinMcCairnPhD/status/1937732108119847100]

The structures in the first two images are about 3-5 times wider than the red blood cells, but red blood cells have a diameter of about 6 µm, so the width of the structures is roughly consistent with McCairn's supposed mini calamari clots, which had a diameter of about 10-20 µm. (The mini clot that McCairn supposedly found in the blood of the 3-year-old appeared to be only about 5 µm wide based on the scale bar in the optical microscope images, but it was about 4 times wider based on the scale bar in the SEM image, and McCairn said the scale bar was more accurate in the SEM image.)

One of McCairn's mini clots was flat like the structures in the first two images, but the others didn't look flat. But even McCairn's flat mini clot had a lengthwise fold in the middle, which was missing from the objects posted by Jesus4AllAlways. And none of McCairn's mini clots looked nearly as translucent as the objects in the first two images, even though I don't know if it may have been due to a difference in lighting or microscopy technique. And McCairn's mini clots didn't have the kind of folds of about 90 degrees as the first two images, where you can see different parts of the folded structure overlapping each other.

So why was McCairn ready to declare that the objects in the images were "amyloidogenic fibrin"?

In 2022 when Shimon Yanowitz was on Maria Zeee's show, he showed an image of the structure below, which has similar folds as the ribbons in the blood of Jesus4AllAlways. He said it was a killer tube which could be programmed to kill the host, and he said: "There are now billions of people walking around with some structures inside of them that could be commanded to open up and release the payload upon external command at will." [https://rumble.com/v20pgz2-optical-fiber-wires-inside-shots-exploding-tubes-kill-the-host-shimon-yanow.html?start=3632]

Ana Maria Mihalcea said that similar translucent ribbons with folds were "hydrogel filaments": [https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/p/comparison-microscopic-analysis-of]

ChatGPT said this about Mihalcea's hydrogel filaments:

Left Image:

Right Image:

Conclusion:

The ribbon in both images is most likely a synthetic fiber accidentally introduced into the sample - possibly from clothing, gloves, wipes, or sample coverslips. It is not a biological structure.

This is what ChatGPT said about Shimon's killer tube:

This image shows a ribbon-like structure under a microscope, viewed with polarized light or differential interference contrast (DIC), based on the high-contrast, crystalline-like edges. The object in question is highly consistent with a synthetic microplastic fiber, most likely polyester, nylon, or another textile-derived filament.

Characteristics Supporting This:

When I asked what the ribbon in the first image by Jesus4AllAlways was, ChatGPT answered: "The structure has sharp folds and flat surfaces, consistent with plastic sheeting or synthetic ribbon fibers, not biological tissue."

Later I asked McCairn if he still stuck to his claim that the images by Jesus4AllAlways showed "amyloidogenic fibrin", and if by "amyloidogenic fibrin" he referred to the flat ribbons with folds. He indicated that he did refer to the flat ribbons with folds, and he said: "I would say from that image of that the ribbon like structure is consistent with the morphology of amyloid fibrillar forms seen in long covid and vax injured." [https://x.com/KevinMcCairnPhD/status/1956090541743202371]

However I again uploaded Mihalcea's images of hydrogel filaments to ChatGPT, and I asked if the folds and flat shape were consistent with a fibrin clot. But ChatGPT said:

No - sharp folds like the ones in your image (especially the ~90° bend in the right-hand picture) are not characteristic of natural fibrin clots.

Here's why:

In short, a true natural fibrin clot won't spontaneously develop a paper-fold-style corner under physiological conditions or during slide prep - unless it's being mechanically crushed between coverslip and slide, in which case it fractures rather than bends smoothly at 90°.

Are fibrin clots human tissue?

Kevin McCairn told me: "They are very clearly blood vessel occlusions, composed of amyloidogenic protein, that have the same properties as amyloidogenic micro clots, that have been proven human tissue through genomic testing." [https://x.com/KevinMcCairnPhD/status/1963634374760698021]

However I told him: "A clump of fibrin is not tissue. If you dipped some rubber in blood and tested it genetically, you would find human DNA from the blood, but that doesn't mean the rubber would be human tissue. It's possible the clots have a human origin, but I think it has not yet been proven." And I showed him this response from ChatGPT:

Calling such clots "human tissue" would be misleading. Here is why:

McCairn posted an AI response which said that the clots are not human tissue, but the clots can be still seen as a "quasi-tissue scaffold", or the clots can be considered to "function as novel pathological pseudo-tissue", but I told him those were bad copes, and that he is a quasi-scientist and he functions as a pseudo-scientist: [https://x.com/KevinMcCairnPhD/status/1963778835692097568]

Diameter of fibers that appear as contaminants on microscope slides

I told McCairn I hadn't found evidence that string-like fibrin clots with a diameter of about 10-30 µm would be circulating freely in human blood.

He showed the images below from a paper where Resia Pretorius was the senior author, and he wrote "Row B is a string like microclot that would be well over 100 micrometers, as it fills the whole micrograph, from whole blood, and stained with ThT." [https://x.com/KevinMcCairnPhD/status/1964523041591091671, https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-35009-y]

I pointed out that the string-like segments in row B had a diameter of only about 1 µm. They also seem to be part of a web-like structure and not lone isolated fibers.

ChatGPT said that various types of fibers that appear as contaminants on microscope slides have a diameter around the range of 10-50 µm, which matches the diameter of the fibers that McCairn has found in blood samples:

Synthetic Fibers

Natural Fibers

Mineral and Glass Fibers

Other Microscopic Fibers

For example these cotton fibers are about 20-25 µm wide at the widest point: [https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Optical-microscope-images-of-a-b-raw-cotton-fibers-and-chemically-purified-cotton_fig1_262571675]

In this image the cotton and linen fibers both have a diameter of about 20 µm: [https://tricliniclabs.com/reference-material/downloadable-documents/APPLICATION_NOTE-CONTAMINANT-IR-FIBROUS-ID-MAY-2023.pdf]

The next photo supposedly shows hydrogel filaments that Mihalcea found in the blood of a corpse embalmed by Hirschman. The filaments are are about 3 red blood cells wide, which is about 20 µm, because red blood cells typically have a diameter of about 6-8 µm: [https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/p/microscopic-analysis-of-blood-preserved]

McCairn said that the fiber below was a "fibrillar form clot" that he found in his own blood. It's about 3-4 red blood cells wide at the widest point. McCairn said the scale bar was wrong and it was supposed to be 50 µm wide, but based on the size of the red blood cells, the scale bar might be closer to 90 µm wide: [https://x.com/Melchizedek1972/status/1964386301186117887, https://x.com/KevinMcCairnPhD/status/1964578431229890968]

These fibers in the blood of Jesus4AllAlways are also about 3 red blood cells wide: [https://x.com/Jesus4AllAlways/status/1937482532544463347]

McCairn supposedly found the next fiber in the blood of someone who was injured by a Moderna vaccine. If the scale bar is accurate, then the fiber is about 15 µm wide: [https://discernable.io/confirmed-evidence-of-biological-engineering-and-novel-clotting-with-dr-kevin-mccairn/, time 142:52]